Literature DB >> 15458854

Suicide risk management for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression study: applied NIMH guidelines.

Andrew A Nierenberg1, Madhukar H Trivedi, Louise Ritz, Diane Burroughs, John Greist, Harold Sackeim, Susan Kornstein, Terry Schwartz, Diane Stegman, Maurizio Fava, Stephen R Wisniewski.   

Abstract

NIMH guidelines to manage subjects who are suicidal during their participation in clinical trials include a full range of procedures to minimize suicidal risk, yet no reports to date have shown how researchers should best implement these guidelines. The architects of the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study operationalized and implemented the NIMH guidelines by developing a comprehensive set of procedures to detect, monitor, and manage suicidal subjects during a large, complex, multisite clinical trial. Because of the large size of the study (anticipated n = 4000), the wide geographic distribution, the large number of treating STAR*D clinicians, the broad array of subjects with psychiatric and medical comorbidities, and the focus on treatment-resistant depression, along with the complexity of multiple treatment steps and randomization points in STAR*D, the risk of suicide, safety monitoring of suicidal subjects presented a unique challenge. This paper describes methods derived from the NIMH guidelines used to manage suicidal risk in STAR*D including the use of an interactive voice response system to alert clinicians, regional center directors, and safety officers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15458854     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  6 in total

1.  Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: design and preliminary data from three approaches.

Authors:  Colin A Depp; Brent Mausbach; Eric Granholm; Veronica Cardenas; Dror Ben-Zeev; Thomas L Patterson; Barry D Lebowitz; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.254

2.  Current practices of suicide risk management protocols in research.

Authors:  Steven Vannoy; Ursula Whiteside; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  Crisis       Date:  2010

3.  The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations.

Authors:  Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Amy B Goldstein; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Anne P Manton; Sarah A Arias; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Primary versus specialty care outcomes for depressed outpatients managed with measurement-based care: results from STAR*D.

Authors:  Bradley N Gaynes; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; G K Balasubramani; Patrick J McGrath; Michael E Thase; Michael Klinkman; Andrew A Nierenberg; William R Yates; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk in clinical research.

Authors:  Heather T Schatten; Brandon A Gaudiano; Jennifer M Primack; Sarah A Arias; Michael F Armey; Ivan W Miller; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Lauren M Weinstock
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-01

6.  Implementation of a Community-Partnered Research Suicide-Risk Management Protocol: Case Study From Community Partners in Care.

Authors:  Nichole Goodsmith; Lily Zhang; Michael K Ong; Victoria K Ngo; Jeanne Miranda; Susan Hirsch; Felica Jones; Kenneth Wells; Bowen Chung
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.