Literature DB >> 15457857

Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review.

Michael L Pearl1, William F Rayburn.   

Abstract

This review summarizes contemporary concepts of abdominal surgical incision creation and closure. The Ovid computerized database was searched for articles published in English from 1996 to 2003 using keywords pertaining to the specific topic of interest (e.g., suture, drain, surgical technique, fascia). Human prospective, randomized trials; meta-analyses; and evidence-based-focused reviews were assessed and data abstracted. Several earlier and animal-based studies on specific issues were included. The data indicate that: (1) the direction of the incision should be based upon obtaining adequate exposure; (2) hair should either be left in place or clipped at the time of surgery; (3) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics should be given 30 minutes prior to surgery; (4) using a "deep" scalpel is unnecessary; (5) a scalpel and electrocautery are comparable for deepening the incision; (6) minimal peritoneal lavage with non-antibiotic containing solutions is adequate; (7) the peritoneum should not be routinely closed; (8) the fascia should be loosely approximated by a continuous mass closure using a slowly absorbable, monofilament suture with the smallest possible caliber and a suture:wound length ratio of at least 4:1; (9) retention sutures, subcutaenous sutures and drains do not appear to reduce the risk of wound complications; and (10) the skin may be closed in a variety of methods, but a semiocclusive dressing should be applied. As scientific evidence accumulates to refute traditional dogma, management of the surgical patient has undergone substantial changes. Surgeons should now be able to create and close an abdominal wound based upon sound scientific principles rather than simply "doing what I always do."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches.

Authors:  D Millbourn; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  [Incision and closure of the abdominal wall].

Authors:  M Bolli; M Schilling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Closing midline abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Leif A Israelsson; Daniel Millbourn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Bhimeswar Nayak G; Pradip Kumar Saha; Rashmi Bagga; Bharti Joshi; Minakshi Rohilla; Shalini Gainder; Pooja Sikka
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.