Literature DB >> 15457692

Comparison of body weight and height between normal and scoliotic children.

Theodoros B Grivas1, Akrivi Arvaniti, Christina Maziotou, Margarita M Manesioti, Anna Fergadi.   

Abstract

AIM: The creation of a database with somatometric parameters (body weight and eight) from school screening children and the comparison of nonscoliotic children with their counterparts suffering of scoliosis to Cobb angle > or =10 degrees curves. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: 3631 screened children where divided in 3 groups. The 1st group comprised normal children with 0 degrees angle of trunk inclination, (ATI). The 2nd group comprised children with ATI > or =1 degree and < or = 6 degrees. The third group comprised children with ATI >7 degrees and Cobb angle > or =10 degrees. The mean/median and standard deviation (+/- 1 SD) of body weight and height, the body mass index (BMI = weight/height2) and the corrected for the scoliotic curve height were calculated by age. Statistical analysis included descriptives (mean, +/- 1 SD, median) and Mann-Whitney non-parametric test.
RESULTS: In boys of the 1st and 2nd group 4,25% had obesity (BMI = 30-35), 2,9% severe obesity (BMI = 30-35) and 1,7% morbid obesity (BMI = 40-45)- while 6,4%, 1,9% and 1,3% in girls respectively. In the 3rd group girls, 27,2% were underweight (BMI = 16-20) and 11,3% severely underweight (BMI < 16), while among boys 42% were severely underweight. In the 3rd group there were no obese girls and only 5% obese boys. The comparison of body weight between scoliotic (3rd group) and nonscoliotic children (1st and 2nd group) fails to show any statistical difference. In the 1st and 2nd group, the girls' mean height is greater than that of boys aged 9 -12 years but less when boys are 13-18 years old. In the 3rd group a mean of 1,15 cm increase is observed after height correction for the scoliotic curve, in boys and 1,3 cm in girls respectively. The comparison of body height (both uncorrected and corrected) between scoliotic and nonscoliotic children fails to show any statistical difference. DISCUSSION-
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of findings regarding the stature and weight of AIS children has been published. In this studied Mediterranean sample of the population, the somatometric parameters of height and weight in children with scoliosis, regardless of curve type and site, are not statistically different from their nonscoliotic counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15457692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  9 in total

1.  Anthropometric characteristics, high prevalence of undernutrition and weight loss: impact on outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Roslyn C Tarrant; Mary Nugent; Anne P Nugent; Joseph M Queally; David P Moore; Patrick J Kiely
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis--result of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth? Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE.

Authors:  X Guo; W-W Chau; Y-L Chan; J-C-Y Cheng; R G Burwell; P H Dangerfield
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Relatively lower body mass index is associated with an excess of severe truncal asymmetry in healthy adolescents: Do white adipose tissue, leptin, hypothalamus and sympathetic nervous system influence truncal growth asymmetry?

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; R Geoffrey Burwell; Constantinos Mihas; Elias S Vasiliadis; Georgios Triantafyllopoulos; Angelos Kaspiris
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-06-30

4.  Pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls - a double neuro-osseous theory involving disharmony between two nervous systems, somatic and autonomic expressed in the spine and trunk: possible dependency on sympathetic nervous system and hormones with implications for medical therapy.

Authors:  R Geoffrey Burwell; Ranjit K Aujla; Michael P Grevitt; Peter H Dangerfield; Alan Moulton; Tabitha L Randell; Susan I Anderson
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-10-31

5.  SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today?

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Marian H Wade; Stefano Negrini; Joseph P O'Brien; Toru Maruyama; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss; Tomasz Kotwicki; Elias S Vasiliadis; Lior Neuhaus Sulam; Tamar Neuhous
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-11-26

6.  Prevalence of incorrect body posture in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Katarzyna Maciałczyk-Paprocka; Barbara Stawińska-Witoszyńska; Tomasz Kotwicki; Anna Sowińska; Alicja Krzyżaniak; Jarosław Walkowiak; Małgorzata Krzywińska-Wiewiorowska
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  The direct cost of "Thriasio" school screening program.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Elias S Vasiliadis; Christina Maziotou; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-05-14

8.  The pendulum swings back to scoliosis screening: screening policies for early detection and treatment of idiopathic scoliosis - current concepts and recommendations.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Michael Timothy Hresko; Hubert Labelle; Nigel Price; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2013-10-29

9.  Association of Body Composition with Curve Severity in Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS).

Authors:  Edyta Matusik; Jacek Durmala; Pawel Matusik
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.