Literature DB >> 15457425

Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 2-center study with an 11-year (mean) follow-up.

Peter A Keblish1, Jean L Briard.   

Abstract

The original Oxford and Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee designs have been used successfully since the mid-1970s, but have had limited exposure. Our study reviews 177 LCS unicompartment replacements (156 medial) with 5-19 years follow-up. Mean age was 68 years, 70% were female, with osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis in 96%. Fixation was cementless in 72% and cemented in 28%. Results were good/excellent [modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS)] in 82%. Scores improved from 60 to 86, mean range of motion 123 degrees. Complications requiring reoperation were 32 of 177 knees (18%). Early failures were technique-related and late failures (3+ years) related to bearing wear/fracture; 15 cases required bearing exchange alone. Low contact stress mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties with 82% prosthetic survivorship at 11 years is encouraging, especially in a more active population and with the success of bearing exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457425     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Early failure of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Mateen H Arastu; J Vijayaraghavan; H Chissell; J B Hull; J H Newman; J R Robinson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The trends in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: A statewide database study.

Authors:  Qais Naziri; Steven A Burekhovich; Patrick J Mixa; Robert Pivec; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Preetesh D Patel; Akhilesh Sastry
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-03

5.  Influence of tibiofemoral congruency design on the wear of patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Y-G Koh; K-M Park; H-Y Lee; K-T Kang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Lateral unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: indications, technique and short-medium term results.

Authors:  Piero Volpi; Luca Marinoni; Corrado Bait; Marco Galli; Matteo Denti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.