Literature DB >> 15457417

Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation.

Adolph V Lombardi1, Thomas H Mallory, John M Cuckler, Joseph Williams, Keith R Berend, Thomas M Smith.   

Abstract

Beginning in December 1995, 193 patients (195 hips) were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter investigational device exemption study. Ninety-eight patients (99 hips) with 46 polyethylene liners and 53 metal liners had minimum 5-year follow-up (mean, 5.7 years). Average follow-up, Harris hip score improvement, and radiographic analysis were not statistically different between groups. No stress shielding or osteolysis was observed in either group. Three polyethylene liners and no metal liners had acetabular radiolucencies <1 mm in 1 or more zones. There have been no device-related complications, no acetabular revisions performed, and none pending in either group. Based on these mid-term results, the authors conclude that a metal-on-metal articulation represents a viable alternative in young, high-demand, active patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457417     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Avascular Necrosis of Head of Femur in Dyskeratosis Congenita - A Rare Presentation.

Authors:  Mukand Lal; Manoj Thakur; Sandeep Kashyap
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Keri L Satterwhite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Dangfeng Zhang; Hui Du; Heng Du; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

6.  Nanostructured diamond coatings for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  S A Catledge; V Thomas; Y K Vohra
Journal:  Woodhead Publ Ser Biomater       Date:  2013

Review 7.  Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Antoine Combes; Charles Berton; Donatien Bocquet; Laurent Vasseur; Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-11

8.  Effect of carbon ion implantation on the tribology of metal-on-metal bearings for artificial joints.

Authors:  Hironobu Koseki; Masato Tomita; Akihiko Yonekura; Takashi Higuchi; Sinya Sunagawa; Koumei Baba; Makoto Osaki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-05-31

9.  The Infection Rate of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement Is Higher When Compared to Other Bearing Surfaces as Documented by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Phil Huang; Matt Lyons; Michael O'Sullivan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-11-13

10.  High Re-Operation Rates Using Conserve Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Articulations.

Authors:  S L Mogensen; T Jakobsen; H Christoffersen; N Krarup
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.