Literature DB >> 15456703

Dynamic changes in meiotic progression and improvement of developmental competence of pig oocytes in vitro by follicle-stimulating hormone and cycloheximide.

J Ye1, K H S Campbell, J Craigon, M R Luck.   

Abstract

The effects of FSH, LH, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the dynamics of nuclear maturation and subsequent embryo development were examined in pig oocytes cultured either conventionally or after preincubation with cycloheximide (CHX). In conventional culture, FSH or EGF significantly increased the rate of attainment of metaphase II (MII) for both gilt (50.0%+/-4.2% and 54.8%+/-4.3%, respectively; control, 5.8%+/-1.8%; P<0.001) and sow (87.6%+/-3.4% and 78.8%+/-3.9%, respectively; control, 7.8%+/-2.5%; P<0.001) oocytes. Gilt oocytes treated with both FSH and EGF showed an additive response (93.7%+/-2.1%). Treatment with LH had no effect. Preincubation with CHX caused the majority (84-100%) of both gilt and sow oocytes to undergo germinal vesicle breakdown. Compared to those treated with LH and/or EGF (both>80%), fewer FSH-treated oocytes reached metaphase I (43.8%+/-5.3%, P<0.001) by 14 h and MII (48.4%+/-5.9%, P<0.001) by 24 h, although the majority (71%) did mature to MII by 36 h after removal of CHX. After in vitro fertilization, higher proportions of both CHX-pretreated and untreated, FSH-exposed oocytes cleaved (71.3%+/-2.9% and 75.3%+/-3.1%, respectively) compared with those not treated with FSH (37.7%+/-3.0% and 43.0%+/-2.9%, respectively; P<0.001). Pretreatment with CHX significantly increased blastocyst yield for both FSH-treated (32.8%+/-2.0% and 10.3%+/-1.5%, respectively; P<0.001) and untreated (16.7%+/-1.5% and 9.4%+/-1.2%, respectively; P<0.001) oocytes. Polyspermy rates were unaffected. In conclusion, pig oocytes meiotically arrested by CHX before maturation retain and improve their developmental competence. FSH stimulates nuclear maturation but slows meiotic progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456703     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  5 in total

1.  Discovery of putative oocyte quality markers by comparative ExacTag proteomics.

Authors:  Michael D Powell; Gaurishankar Manandhar; Lee Spate; Miriam Sutovsky; Shawn Zimmerman; Shrikesh C Sachdev; Mark Hannink; Randall S Prather; Peter Sutovsky
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Impact of gonadotropin supplementation on the expression of germ cell marker genes (MATER, ZAR1, GDF9, and BMP15) during in vitro maturation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocyte.

Authors:  Amar Nath; Veena Sharma; Pawan K Dubey; M D Pratheesh; Nitin E Gade; G Saikumar; G Taru Sharma
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Comparison of Oocyte Maturation Trigger Using Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus Human Chorionic Gonadotropin versus hCG Alone in Assisted Reproduction Technology Cycles.

Authors:  Saeedeh Dashti; Abbas Aflatoonian; Nasim Tabibnejad
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04-27

4.  FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus.

Authors:  Mourad Assidi; François J Richard; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 5.  Factors Influencing the In Vitro Maturation (IVM) of Human Oocyte.

Authors:  Huixia Yang; Thomas Kolben; Sarah Meister; Corinna Paul; Julia van Dorp; Sibel Eren; Christina Kuhn; Martina Rahmeh; Sven Mahner; Udo Jeschke; Viktoria von Schönfeldt
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.