Literature DB >> 15455584

An improved methodology for advancing nursing research: factorial surveys.

Ruth Ludwick1, Marion Elizabeth Wright, Richard Allen Zeller, Dawn W Dowding, William Lauder, Janice Winchell.   

Abstract

Clinical judgments and decisions are an integral component of nurse work and nurses are increasingly being challenged to account for their judgments and decisions. Nursing research is needed to help explain judgment and decision making in nursing, but most research in this area is almost exclusively characterized by descriptive studies. This article describes the use of the factorial survey method, which combines the explanatory power of a factorial experiment with the benefits of a sample survey. This hybrid technique is an excellent method for studying judgments and decisions across settings, roles, disciplines, and countries. This article outlines the steps of the method and demonstrates its applicability with an exemplar from a study across nurses from 3 countries.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15455584     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200407000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  6 in total

1.  Not so simple: a quasi-experimental study of how researchers adjudicate genetic research results.

Authors:  Robin Zoe Hayeems; Fiona Alice Miller; Li Li; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Patient factors that influence clinicians' decision making in self-management support: A clinical vignette study.

Authors:  Irene D Bos-Touwen; Jaap C A Trappenburg; Ineke van der Wulp; Marieke J Schuurmans; Niek J de Wit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Determinants of intentions to monitor antihypertensive medication adherence in Irish community pharmacy: a factorial survey.

Authors:  Paul Dillon; Ronald McDowell; Susan M Smith; Paul Gallagher; Gráinne Cousins
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica Sheringham; Isla Kuhn; Jenni Burt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians' decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies.

Authors:  Spencer C Evans; Michael C Roberts; Jared W Keeley; Jennifer B Blossom; Christina M Amaro; Andrea M Garcia; Cathleen Odar Stough; Kimberly S Canter; Rebeca Robles; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2015-01-29

6.  Multi-Site Study of Provider Self-Efficacy and Beliefs in Explaining Judgments About Need and Responsibility for Advance Care Planning.

Authors:  Kristin R Baughman; Ruth Ludwick; David Jarjoura; Mia Yeager; Denise Kropp
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.