Literature DB >> 15455383

Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?

Allan Jensen1, Anne Helene Olsen, My von Euler-Chelpin, Sisse Helle Njor, Ilse Vejborg, Elsebeth Lynge.   

Abstract

The objectives of our study were to analyse the use of diagnostic mammography among nonattenders and attenders in organised mammography screening in Denmark in 2000, to assess the contamination from organised screening of noninvited age groups and to measure the impact of local policy on opportunistic screening. Data on all diagnostic mammographies performed in Denmark in 2000 and data on women targeted by the 2 organised mammography screening programmes in Copenhagen and the county of Fyn were collected. All data were linked by the Danish personal identification number. Information on the official policy in 2000 with regard to opportunistic screening was collected from all counties. The proportion of women using diagnostic mammography was only 1-3% for both attenders and nonattenders in organised mammography screening, but it was significantly higher in Copenhagen than in Fyn, due to availability of mammography in private clinics. The proportion of women using diagnostic mammography varied from 1-4% across counties. The official policy on access to diagnostic mammography and contamination from organised mammography screening of adjacent age groups had no impact on the use. Instead, urbanisation was positively correlated with use of diagnostic mammography. In conclusion, our results clearly showed that nonattenders in organised mammography screening programmes do not seek mammography outside the programme. Since a positive policy toward opportunistic screening did not have any effect, our results add further evidence to existing knowledge that the only reasonable way to achieve high mammography coverage is through a well-organised screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15455383     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  18 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's.

Authors:  Malin Kjellén; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Per-Henrik Zahl; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

3.  Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study.

Authors:  Karsten J Jørgensen; Per-Henrik Zahl; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Performance of diagnostic mammography differs in the United States and Denmark.

Authors:  Allan Jensen; Berta M Geller; Charlotte C Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie Yankaskas; Patricia A Carney; Robert D Rosenberg; Ilse Vejborg; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Breast cancer screening in the Czech Republic: time trends in performance indicators during the first seven years of the organised programme.

Authors:  Ondrej Majek; Jan Danes; Miroslava Skovajsova; Helena Bartonkova; Lucie Buresova; Daniel Klimes; Petr Brabec; Pavel Kozeny; Ladislav Dusek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  The relation between socioeconomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, 1983-1999.

Authors:  S O Dalton; M Düring; L Ross; K Carlsen; P B Mortensen; J Lynch; C Johansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophie Sell Hellmann; Sisse Helle Njor; Elsebeth Lynge; My von Euler-Chelpin; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Ilse Vejborg; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Sisse Helle Njor; Anne Helene Olsen; Mogens Blichert-Toft; Walter Schwartz; Ilse Vejborg; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-26

9.  Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography.

Authors:  Line Flytkjær Jensen; Anette Fischer Pedersen; Berit Andersen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Determinants of the number of mammography units in 31 countries with significant mammography screening.

Authors:  P Autier; D Ait Ouakrim; D A Ouakrim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.