Literature DB >> 15454677

Selecting appropriate animal models and experimental designs for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies.

William S Stokes1.   

Abstract

Evidence that chemicals in the environment may cause developmental and reproductive abnormalities in fish and wildlife by disrupting normal endocrine functions has increased concern about potential adverse human health effects from such chemicals. US laws have now been enacted that require the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop and validate a screening program to identify chemicals in food and water with potential endocrine-disrupting activity. EPA subsequently proposed an Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program that uses in vitro and in vivo test systems to identify chemicals that may adversely affect humans and ecologically important animal species. However, the endocrine system can be readily modulated by many experimental factors, including diet and the genetic background of the selected animal strain or stock. It is therefore desirable to minimize or avoid factors that cause or contribute to experimental variation in endocrine disruptor research and testing studies. Standard laboratory animal diets contain high and variable levels of phytoestrogens, which can modulate physiologic and behavioral responses similar to both endogenous estrogen as well as exogenous estrogenic chemicals. Other studies have determined that some commonly used outbred mice and rats are less responsive to estrogenic substances than certain inbred mouse and rat strains for various estrogen-sensitive endpoints. It is therefore critical to select appropriate biological models and diets for endocrine disruptor studies that provide optimal sensitivity and specificity to accomplish the research or testing objectives. An introduction is provided to 11 other papers in this issue that review these and other important laboratory animal experimental design considerations in greater detail, and that review laboratory animal and in vitro models currently being used or evaluated for endocrine disruptor research and testing. Selection of appropriate animal models and experimental design parameters for endocrine disruptor research and testing will minimize confounding experimental variables, increase the likelihood of replicable experimental results, and contribute to more reliable and relevant test systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454677     DOI: 10.1093/ilar.45.4.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Mouse strain does not influence the overall effects of bisphenol a-induced toxicity in adult antral follicles.

Authors:  Jackye Peretz; Steven L Neese; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 3.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals targeting estrogen receptor signaling: identification and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Erin K Shanle; Wei Xu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  Obesogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: Identifying Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Almudena Veiga-Lopez; Yong Pu; Jeremy Gingrich; Vasantha Padmanabhan
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 5.  Estrogen regulation of testicular function.

Authors:  Benson T Akingbemi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  A unique co-culture model for fundamental and applied studies of human fetoplacental steroidogenesis and interference by environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Hudon Thibeault; Kathy Deroy; Cathy Vaillancourt; J Thomas Sanderson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Direct and transgenerational effects of low doses of perinatal di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on social behaviors in mice.

Authors:  Kayla M Quinnies; Erin P Harris; Rodney W Snyder; Susan S Sumner; Emilie F Rissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Endocrine Disruptors Induced Distinct Expression of Thyroid and Estrogen Receptors in Rat versus Mouse Primary Cerebellar Cell Cultures.

Authors:  Gergely Jocsak; Eniko Ioja; David Sandor Kiss; Istvan Toth; Zoltan Barany; Tibor Bartha; Laszlo V Frenyo; Attila Zsarnovszky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-05

9.  Impact of Fusarium-Derived Mycoestrogens on Female Reproduction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn W Kinkade; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Ludwik Gorcyzca; Lauren M Aleksunes; Emily S Barrett
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  A computational model to predict rat ovarian steroid secretion from in vitro experiments with endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Nadia Quignot; Frédéric Y Bois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.