Literature DB >> 15454143

The future of wound healing: pursuing surgical models in transgenic and knockout mice.

Russell R Reid1, Hakim K Said, Jon E Mogford, Thomas A Mustoe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transgenic and knockout technologies have made determination of the molecular basis of wound healing possible. But there is no comprehensive or standardized approach to the investigation of wound healing in the mouse. A convention is proposed for assessing the multiple dimensions of wound healing. An approach to phenotyping a transgenic or knockout animal in a reproducible fashion is presented using this convention. STUDY
DESIGN: Age- and gender-matched wildtype and knockout mice were characterized using six parameters of wound healing: epithelialization, granulation tissue formation, contraction, tensile strength, angiogenesis, and response to ischemia. Six surgical (four standard and two impaired) models were designed and used to quantitate these parameters. These models can be combined to efficiently maximize the data from any given subject.
RESULTS: Each model leads to a rapid yield of results, with an average turnover of 4.9 days (range 3 to 7 days), and morbidity and mortality were minimal. A combinatorial approach elucidates the precise wound repair deficit of any subject. A case example is presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Six surgical models investigating pertinent wound healing parameters are available. A factorial approach of quantitative wound healing assays maximizes data gathered from any one animal, minimizing the number of transgenic and knockout subjects needed; finely dissects molecular pathways of wound healing; and rapidly phenotypes a particular genetically altered mouse. We propose a standardized approach to wound healing assays that will elucidate critical cellular and molecular mechanisms and potential therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454143     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  19 in total

1.  The cellular biology of flexor tendon adhesion formation: an old problem in a new paradigm.

Authors:  Jason K F Wong; Yin H Lui; Zoher Kapacee; Karl E Kadler; Mark W J Ferguson; Duncan A McGrouther
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment.

Authors:  Daniela S Masson-Meyers; Thiago A M Andrade; Guilherme F Caetano; Francielle R Guimaraes; Marcel N Leite; Saulo N Leite; Marco Andrey C Frade
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Murine model of wound healing.

Authors:  Louise Dunn; Hamish C G Prosser; Joanne T M Tan; Laura Z Vanags; Martin K C Ng; Christina A Bursill
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Diminished type III collagen promotes myofibroblast differentiation and increases scar deposition in cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Susan W Volk; Yanjian Wang; Elizabeth A Mauldin; Kenneth W Liechty; Sherrill L Adams
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 5.  Models for the histologic study of the skin interface with percutaneous biomaterials.

Authors:  P Fleckman; J E Olerud
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Low-level light stimulates excisional wound healing in mice.

Authors:  Tatiana N Demidova-Rice; Elena V Salomatina; Anna N Yaroslavsky; Ira M Herman; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Splinting Strategies to Overcome Confounding Wound Contraction in Experimental Animal Models.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Davidson; Fang Yu; Susan R Opalenik
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Human platelet-rich plasma- and extracellular matrix-derived peptides promote impaired cutaneous wound healing in vivo.

Authors:  Tatiana N Demidova-Rice; Lindsey Wolf; Jeffry Deckenback; Michael R Hamblin; Ira M Herman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rhamm-/- fibroblasts are defective in CD44-mediated ERK1,2 motogenic signaling, leading to defective skin wound repair.

Authors:  Cornelia Tolg; Sara R Hamilton; Kerry-Ann Nakrieko; Fatemeh Kooshesh; Paul Walton; James B McCarthy; Mina J Bissell; Eva A Turley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on cutaneous tensile strength during wound healing.

Authors:  John B Christoforidis; Jillian Wang; Angela Jiang; James Willard; Cedric Pratt; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Sashwati Roy; Heather Powell
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.