Literature DB >> 15453939

Endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy: long-term results and evolution of surgical technique.

V S P Durvasula1, D J Gatland.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the long-term results of endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) performed as a day-case procedure under local anaesthesia. It assessed the patient satisfaction with the procedure by retrospective review and a questionnaire survey. Seventy patients were referred for endoscopic DCR to the senior author between 1997 and 2000. A success rate of 92 per cent was achieved at three months and it was possible to perform 85 per cent of cases under local anaesthetic; 91 per cent were discharged on the same day. Long-term follow up by postal survey revealed that the watering eye had improved following surgery in 83 per cent (follow up range = eight to 66 months; mean = 28.6 months). Eighty-eight per cent were satisfied with the tolerability of the procedure under local anaesthesia. The authors describe changes in technique, which evolved with their experience of the procedure. Endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy can be performed safely and successfully as a day-case procedure under local anaesthesia with excellent results and with great satisfaction to the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15453939     DOI: 10.1258/0022215041917835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  11 in total

1.  Endoscopic vs external dacryocystorhinostomy-comparison from the patients' aspect.

Authors:  Serdar Ozer; Pinar A Ozer
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results.

Authors:  Ozgur Yigit; Mehmet Samancioglu; Umit Taskin; Serdar Ceylan; Kadir Eltutar; Murat Yener
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Changes in cytokines in tears after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  J K Lee; T H Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparative Analysis of Laser Assisted Endoscopie and Conventional Endoscopie Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  S S Panwar; P Lal; P S Sukhtankar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with conventional instruments: results and advantages over external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Vikas Sinha; Devang Gupta; Bela Prajapati; Yogesh More; Priyanka Khandelwal; Shashank Nath Singh; B Himanshu
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-10-22

6.  Pathologic features and expression of heat shock protein 47 in the nasal mucosa and lacrimal sac: does it influence the surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy?

Authors:  Jinhwan Park; Joonsik Lee; Sehyun Baek
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Endoscopic versus external approach dacryocystorhinostomy: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Rinki Saha; Anuradha Sinha; Jyoti Prakash Phukan
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2013-05

8.  A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  R Karim; R Ghabrial; Tf Lynch; B Tang
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-12

9.  Patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in northern iran: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  M Majidaee; M Mohammadi; Mr Rezaee Sheikh; M Khademlu; Ma Heidari Gorji
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-05

10.  Revision External Dacryocystorhinostomy Results After a Failed Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery.

Authors:  Emine Akcay; Nilay Yuksel; Umut Ozen
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.