Literature DB >> 15452833

Uterine serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas: is there a survival difference?

David M Boruta1, Paola A Gehrig, Pamela A Groben, Victoria Bae-Jump, John F Boggess, Wesley C Fowler, Linda Van Le.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serous components within endometrial carcinoma are reportedly poor prognosticators. However, to the authors' knowledge the percentage of tumors which must be comprised of a serous component in order to affect outcome is unknown. The authors compared overall survival (OS) in women with endometrial carcinomas comprised of various percentages of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) with that of women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma (G3EC) to determine whether outcomes varied between these two poorly differentiated histologies.
METHODS: Data concerning women with either G3EC or USC who were diagnosed between January 1990 and November 2000 were collected retrospectively. Cases were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and estimate the fraction of tumor comprised of USC. Variables assessed included patient age and race, tumor stage, and lymphovascular space invasion. Associations between variables were tested using the Fisher exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS with comparisons performed using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Fifty-two women with G3EC and 87 women with USC were identified. The OS of women with tumors comprised of > 50% USC was found to be significantly worse compared with women with G3EC (hazard ratio [HR] of 2.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.2-5.2). Women with USC were more likely to present with extrauterine disease (odds ratio of 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5). The 5-year survival rate for women with G3EC was 75% compared with 41% for women with tumors that were > 50% USC (P = 0.01). There was a significant trend toward a worse OS in women with even 10% USC compared with women with G3EC.
CONCLUSIONS: USC involving > 50% of an endometrial carcinoma was found to be predictive of worse OS compared with the OS of women with G3EC. In patients with early-stage disease, a trend toward a worse prognosis was found to exist when USC comprised even 10% of a tumor. Investigation into the treatment of endometrial carcinoma should include and document tumors with any percentage comprised of USC. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15452833     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  P Mhawech-Fauceglia; R F Herrmann; J Kesterson; I Izevbaye; S Lele; K Odunsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), a second-generation irreversible pan-erbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrates remarkable activity against HER2-amplified uterine serous endometrial cancer in vitro.

Authors:  Liancheng Zhu; Salvatore Lopez; Stefania Bellone; Jonathan Black; Emiliano Cocco; Tiffany Zigras; Federica Predolini; Elena Bonazzoli; Beatrice Bussi; Zachary Stuhmer; Carlton L Schwab; Diana P English; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas J Rutherford; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-11

3.  Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Joel L Weissfeld; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathryn P Pennington; Tom Walsh; Ming Lee; Christopher Pennil; Akiva P Novetsky; Kathy J Agnew; Anne Thornton; Rochelle Garcia; David Mutch; Mary-Claire King; Paul Goodfellow; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Agnes B Colanta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Young-Tak Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Insuk Sohn; Shin-Wha Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Kyu-Rae Kim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

9.  Tubulin-β-III overexpression by uterine serous carcinomas is a marker for poor overall survival after platinum/taxane chemotherapy and sensitivity to epothilones.

Authors:  Dana M Roque; Stefania Bellone; Diana P English; Natalia Buza; Emiliano Cocco; Sara Gasparrini; Ileana Bortolomai; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Taselisib, a selective inhibitor of PIK3CA, is highly effective on PIK3CA-mutated and HER2/neu amplified uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Salvatore Lopez; Carlton L Schwab; Emiliano Cocco; Stefania Bellone; Elena Bonazzoli; Diana P English; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas Rutherford; Roberto Angioli; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.