Literature DB >> 15452398

Activity of nadifloxacin (OPC-7251) and seven other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria isolated from bacterial skin infections.

P Nenoff1, U-F Haustein, N Hittel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The in vitro activity of nadifloxacin (OPC-7251), a novel topical fluoroquinolone, was assessed and compared with those of ofloxacin, oxacillin, flucloxacillin, cefotiam, erythromycin, clindamycin, and gentamicin against 144 Gram-positive bacteria: 28 Staphylococcus aureus, 10 Streptococcus spp., 68 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 36 Propionibacterium acnes, and 2 Propionibacterium granulosum strains. All strains originated from bacterial-infected skin disease and were isolated from patients with impetigo, secondary infected wounds, folliculitis and sycosis vulgaris, and impetiginized dermatitis. In vitro susceptibility of all clinical isolates was tested by agar dilution procedure and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined.
RESULTS: Nadifloxacin was active against all aerobic and anaerobic isolates. MIC(90) (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited) was 0.1 microg/ml for S. aureus, 0.78 microg/ml for both Streptococcus spp. and CNS, and 0.39 microg/ml for Propionibacterium spp. On the other hand, resistant strains with MICs exceeding 12.5 mug/ml were found in tests with the other antibiotics. For both CNS and Propionibacterium acnes, MIC(90) values > or =100 microg/ml were demonstrated for erythromycin. Ofloxacin, cefotiam, erythromycin, clindamycin and gentamicin exhibited MIC(90) values < or =1 microg/ml for some bacterial species tested. Both oxacillin and flucloxacillin were active against all investigated bacterial species with MIC(90) values < or =1 microg/ml.
CONCLUSION: In summary, nadifloxacin, a topical fluoroquinolone, was found to be highly active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with infected skin disease, and seems to be a new alternative for topical antibiotic treatment in bacterial skin infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15452398     DOI: 10.1159/000081032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of topical nadifloxacin and benzoyl peroxide versus clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide in acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Choudhury; S Chatterjee; D K Sarkar; R N Dutta
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.200

2.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of topical 1% nadifloxacin and tretinoin 0.025% combination therapy with 1% clindamycin and tretinoin 0.025% combination therapy in patients of mild-to-moderate acne.

Authors:  Swapnil Narayan Deshmukh; Vandana Avinash Badar; Manali Mangesh Mahajan; D Sujata Dudhgaonkar; Dharmendra Mishra
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

3.  Glycosides of Nadifloxacin-Synthesis and Antibacterial Activities against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mark Hutchins; Richard A Bovill; Peter J Stephens; John A Brazier; Helen M I Osborn
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Topical Antibacterials in Dermatology.

Authors:  Debabrata Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Efficacy and safety of nadifloxacin for bacterial skin infections: results from clinical and post-marketing studies.

Authors:  Varsha Narayanan; Salman Motlekar; Ganesh Kadhe; Seema Bhagat
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2014-09-12

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of topical fixed combination of nadifloxacin 1% and adapalene 0.1% in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris in Indian patients: a multicenter, open-labelled, prospective study.

Authors:  Bela Jaswantlal Shah; Tharayil Kunneth Sumathy; Rachita Savalaram Dhurat; Raghunandan Govind Torsekar; Vishalakshi Viswanath; Jayesh Ishwardas Mukhi; Ganesh Kadhe; Pashmina Ahirrao
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  In healthy volunteers, taking flucloxacillin with food does not compromise effective plasma concentrations in most circumstances.

Authors:  Sharon J Gardiner; Philip G Drennan; Ronald Begg; Mei Zhang; Jared K Green; Heather L Isenman; Richard J Everts; Stephen T Chambers; Evan J Begg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.