BACKGROUND: Deletions and mutations in the NSD1 gene are the major cause of Sotos syndrome. We wanted to evaluate the genotype-phenotype correlation in patients suspected of having Sotos syndrome and determine the best discriminating parameters for the presence of a NSD1 gene alteration. METHODS: Mutation and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed on blood samples of 59 patients who were clinically scored into 3 groups. Clinical data were compared between patients with and without NSD1 alterations. With logistic regression analysis the best combination of predictive variables was obtained. RESULTS: In the groups of typical, dubious and atypical Sotos syndrome, 81, 36 and 0% of the patients, respectively, showed NSD1 gene alterations. Four deletions were detected. In 23 patients (2 families) 19 mutations were detected (1 splicing defect, 3 non-sense, 7 frameshift and 8 missense mutations). The best predictive parameters for a NSD1 gene alteration were frontal bossing, down-slanted palpebral fissures, pointed chin and overgrowth. Higher incidences of feeding problems and cardiac anomalies were found. The parameters, delayed development and advanced bone age, did not differ between the 2 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients suspected of having Sotos syndrome, facial features and overgrowth were highly predictive of a NSD1 gene aberration, whereas developmental delay and advanced bone age were not. Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: Deletions and mutations in the NSD1 gene are the major cause of Sotos syndrome. We wanted to evaluate the genotype-phenotype correlation in patients suspected of having Sotos syndrome and determine the best discriminating parameters for the presence of a NSD1 gene alteration. METHODS: Mutation and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed on blood samples of 59 patients who were clinically scored into 3 groups. Clinical data were compared between patients with and without NSD1 alterations. With logistic regression analysis the best combination of predictive variables was obtained. RESULTS: In the groups of typical, dubious and atypical Sotos syndrome, 81, 36 and 0% of the patients, respectively, showed NSD1 gene alterations. Four deletions were detected. In 23 patients (2 families) 19 mutations were detected (1 splicing defect, 3 non-sense, 7 frameshift and 8 missense mutations). The best predictive parameters for a NSD1 gene alteration were frontal bossing, down-slanted palpebral fissures, pointed chin and overgrowth. Higher incidences of feeding problems and cardiac anomalies were found. The parameters, delayed development and advanced bone age, did not differ between the 2 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients suspected of having Sotos syndrome, facial features and overgrowth were highly predictive of a NSD1 gene aberration, whereas developmental delay and advanced bone age were not. Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Gustavo H Vieira; Melissa M Cook; Renata L Ferreira De Lima; Carlos E Frigério Domingues; Daniel R de Carvalho; Isaias Soares de Paiva; Danilo Moretti-Ferreira; Anand K Srivastava Journal: Mol Syndromol Date: 2015-01-21
Authors: Danielle Christine Maria van der Kaay; Anne Rochtus; Gerhard Binder; Ingo Kurth; Dirk Prawitt; Irène Netchine; Gudmundur Johannsson; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Miriam Elbracht; Thomas Eggermann Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 3.221
Authors: Kyungsoo Ha; Priya Anand; Jennifer A Lee; Julie R Jones; Chong Ae Kim; Debora Romeo Bertola; Jonathan D J Labonne; Lawrence C Layman; Wolfgang Wenzel; Hyung-Goo Kim Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 4.096