PURPOSE: To map the distribution of cone- or rod-induced retinal responsiveness by optical imaging from macaque retina. METHODS: The light reflectance changes in the posterior retina after a flash stimulus in anesthetized rhesus monkeys were measured by a modified fundus camera system equipped with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. The response topography of the optical signals was obtained in either light- or dark-adapted conditions. RESULTS: With infrared observation light, the whole posterior pole became darkened after the stimulus. The response topography in light-adapted conditions demonstrated a steep peak of darkening at the fovea, together with the gradual decrease of signal intensity away from the fovea toward the periphery. In dark-adapted conditions, the optical signal showed additional peaks along the circular region surrounding the macula at the eccentricity of the optic disc, together with the central peak at the fovea. A statistically significant positive correlation was obtained between the light reflectance changes in infrared observation light and the focal responses in multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) at the corresponding retinal locations. CONCLUSIONS: The response topography in the retina, obtained by optical imaging, was consistent with psychophysical cone or rod sensitivity in humans and anatomic cone or rod distribution in humans and macaques. The cone- or rod-induced retinal responsiveness within the posterior pole region was noninvasively recorded within a short recording time.
PURPOSE: To map the distribution of cone- or rod-induced retinal responsiveness by optical imaging from macaque retina. METHODS: The light reflectance changes in the posterior retina after a flash stimulus in anesthetized rhesus monkeys were measured by a modified fundus camera system equipped with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. The response topography of the optical signals was obtained in either light- or dark-adapted conditions. RESULTS: With infrared observation light, the whole posterior pole became darkened after the stimulus. The response topography in light-adapted conditions demonstrated a steep peak of darkening at the fovea, together with the gradual decrease of signal intensity away from the fovea toward the periphery. In dark-adapted conditions, the optical signal showed additional peaks along the circular region surrounding the macula at the eccentricity of the optic disc, together with the central peak at the fovea. A statistically significant positive correlation was obtained between the light reflectance changes in infrared observation light and the focal responses in multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) at the corresponding retinal locations. CONCLUSIONS: The response topography in the retina, obtained by optical imaging, was consistent with psychophysical cone or rod sensitivity in humans and anatomic cone or rod distribution in humans and macaques. The cone- or rod-induced retinal responsiveness within the posterior pole region was noninvasively recorded within a short recording time.
Authors: Michael D Abràmoff; Young H Kwon; Dan Ts'o; Peter Soliz; Bridget Zimmerman; Joel Pokorny; Randy Kardon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Qiang Shen; Haiying Cheng; Machelle T Pardue; Thomas F Chang; Govind Nair; Van Toi Vo; Ross D Shonat; Timothy Q Duong Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Alexandre R Tumlinson; Boris Hermann; Bernd Hofer; Boris Povazay; Tom H Margrain; Alison M Binns; Wolfgang Drexler Journal: Jpn J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Yi Zhang; Oscar San Emeterio Nateras; Qi Peng; Roman V Kuranov; Joseph M Harrison; Thomas E Milner; Timothy Q Duong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 4.799