Literature DB >> 15451868

Communication mode and the processing of printed words: evidence from readers with prelingually acquired deafness.

Paul Miller1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to elucidate how the primary communication background of prelingual deafened readers affects the way they mediate the recognition of written words. A computer-controlled research paradigm (a semantic decision task) asking for the categorization of familiar Hebrew nouns was used to investigate the participants' sensibility to phonological and orthographic manipulations in the target stimuli. Two groups of readers with hearing impairments and a hearing control group participated in the study. Twenty-seven of the participants with deafness (mean grade 6.9) were raised by hearing parents advocating a strict oral approach at home and at school. For an additional 22 students who were deaf (mean grade 6.9), the majority of them children of deaf parents, Israeli Sign Language was the preferred means of communication. The mean grade of the 39 participants in the hearing control group was 6.5. Findings indicate that both the hearing participants and the participants with prelingual deafness who were trained to communicate orally recoded visually presented target words phonologically. No such evidence was found for participants with deafness who were native signers. Although participants from signing backgrounds seemed to generate nonphonological representations of written words, there was no evidence that for them, the absence of recoding to phonology detrimentally affected on their ability to process such representations flexibly. In all, findings suggest a causal link between an individual's processing strategy for some written words and the modal nature of his or her primary language.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15451868     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/7.4.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  4 in total

1.  Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Alex A del Giudice; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-11-11

2.  Processing unpointed Hebrew: what can we learn from determining the identicalness of monosyllabic and bisyllabic nouns.

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-05

3.  The importance of vowel diacritics for the temporary retention of high and low frequency Hebrew words of varying syllabic length.

Authors:  Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum; Paul Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Visual word recognition in deaf readers: lexicality is modulated by communication mode.

Authors:  Laura Barca; Giovanni Pezzulo; Marianna Castrataro; Pasquale Rinaldi; Maria Cristina Caselli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.