BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic reactions to mental stress may contribute to atherosclerosis. We previously observed cross-sectional relationships between blood pressure reactions to a standardized stress battery and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease (KIHD) study. These are the first prospective results on this relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: Men from 4 age cohorts (42 to 60 years old at study onset) were challenged with a standardized mental stress battery, and heart rate and blood pressure reactions were assessed. Ultrasound measures of common carotid IMT were collected at this time and 7 years later as noninvasive markers of atherosclerosis. Data were collected from a sample of 756 men at both times. Systolic blood pressure reactions to mental stress at study onset were positively related to mean carotid IMT 7 years later (beta=0.035, P=0.001, by blood pressure quartile, IMT=0.91, 0.93, 0.96, 1.00 mm) and to the progression of IMT (beta=0.020, P=0.006, by blood pressure quartile, DeltaIMT=0.08, 0.09, 0.11, 0.11 mm). Similar significant relations were shown for maximal IMT and plaque height. Diastolic blood pressure responses were less strongly related to carotid IMT than were systolic responses. Heart-rate responses were unrelated. Adjustment for standard risk factors did not substantially reduce the relation between systolic blood pressure reactivity and the progression of mean carotid IMT (standardized beta=0.059, P=0.026), maximal carotid IMT (standardized beta=0.084, P=0.006), or plaque height (standardized beta=0.093, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of systolic blood pressure reactivity to mental challenge is prospectively related to carotid IMT in middle-aged and older men, independent of known risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic reactions to mental stress may contribute to atherosclerosis. We previously observed cross-sectional relationships between blood pressure reactions to a standardized stress battery and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease (KIHD) study. These are the first prospective results on this relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS:Men from 4 age cohorts (42 to 60 years old at study onset) were challenged with a standardized mental stress battery, and heart rate and blood pressure reactions were assessed. Ultrasound measures of common carotid IMT were collected at this time and 7 years later as noninvasive markers of atherosclerosis. Data were collected from a sample of 756 men at both times. Systolic blood pressure reactions to mental stress at study onset were positively related to mean carotid IMT 7 years later (beta=0.035, P=0.001, by blood pressure quartile, IMT=0.91, 0.93, 0.96, 1.00 mm) and to the progression of IMT (beta=0.020, P=0.006, by blood pressure quartile, DeltaIMT=0.08, 0.09, 0.11, 0.11 mm). Similar significant relations were shown for maximal IMT and plaque height. Diastolic blood pressure responses were less strongly related to carotid IMT than were systolic responses. Heart-rate responses were unrelated. Adjustment for standard risk factors did not substantially reduce the relation between systolic blood pressure reactivity and the progression of mean carotid IMT (standardized beta=0.059, P=0.026), maximal carotid IMT (standardized beta=0.084, P=0.006), or plaque height (standardized beta=0.093, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of systolic blood pressure reactivity to mental challenge is prospectively related to carotid IMT in middle-aged and older men, independent of known risk factors.
Authors: V Donadio; R Liguori; M Elam; T Karlsson; M P Giannoccaro; G Pegenius; F Giambattistelli; B G Wallin Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Timothy W Smith; Bert N Uchino; Justin MacKenzie; Angela M Hicks; Rebecca A Campo; Maija Reblin; Karen M Grewen; Janet A Amico; Kathleen C Light Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Peter J Gianaros; J Richard Jennings; Lei K Sheu; Stuart W G Derbyshire; Karen A Matthews Journal: Hypertension Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Peter J Gianaros; Stuart W G Derbyshire; J Christopher May; Greg J Siegle; Mark A Gamalo; J Richard Jennings Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Cecilia Castro-Diehl; Ana V Diez Roux; Susan Redline; Teresa Seeman; Paula McKinley; Richard Sloan; Steven Shea Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Nicole L Spartano; Jacqueline A Augustine; Wesley K Lefferts; Brooks B Gump; Kevin S Heffernan Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 5.162