Literature DB >> 15451786

Survival after coronary revascularization among patients with kidney disease.

Brenda R Hemmelgarn1, Danielle Southern, Bruce F Culleton, L Brent Mitchell, Merril L Knudtson, William A Ghali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to revascularization in patients with kidney disease has not been determined. We studied survival by treatment group (CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or no revascularization) for patients with 3 categories of kidney function: dialysis-dependent kidney disease, non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease, and a reference group (serum creatinine <2.3 mg/dL). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data were derived from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), which captures information on all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada. Characteristics and patient survival in 662 dialysis patients (1.6%) and 750 non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients (1.8%) were compared with the remainder of the 40,374 patients (96.6%). For the reference group, the adjusted 8-year survival rates for CABG, PCI, and no revascularization (NR) were 85.5%, 80.4%, and 72.3%, respectively (P<0.001 for CABG versus NR; P<0.001 for PCI versus NR). Adjusted survival rates were 45.9% for CABG, 32.7% for PCI, and 29.7% for NR in the nondialysis kidney disease group (P<0.001 for CABG versus NR; P=0.48 for PCI versus NR) and 44.8% for CABG, 41.2% for PCI, and 30.4% for NR in the dialysis group (P=0.003 for CABG versus NR; P=0.03 for PCI versus NR).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no revascularization, CABG was associated with better survival in all categories of kidney function. PCI was also associated with a lower risk of death than no revascularization in reference patients and dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients but not in patients with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease. The presence of kidney disease or dependence on dialysis should not be a deterrent to revascularization, particularly with CABG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451786     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143629.55725.D9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  41 in total

1.  Long-Term Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

Authors:  Wojciech Wańha; Damian Kawecki; Tomasz Roleder; Aleksandra Pluta; Kamil Marcinkiewicz; Beata Morawiec; Janusz Dola; Sylwia Gładysz; Tomasz Pawłowski; Grzegorz Smolka; Andrzej Ochała; Ewa Nowalany-Kozielska; Wojciech Wojakowski
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 2.  How to balance risks and benefits in the management of CKD patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marenzi; Nicola Cosentino; Carlo Guastoni
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ESRD.

Authors:  Tara I Chang; David Shilane; Dhruv S Kazi; Maria E Montez-Rath; Mark A Hlatky; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Antiplatelet agents in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Massimiliano Migliori; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Alessia Scatena; Vincenzo Panichi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  [Heart and kidneys].

Authors:  D Kiski; H Reinecke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Imaging- and physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention without contrast administration in advanced renal failure: a feasibility, safety, and outcome study.

Authors:  Ziad A Ali; Keyvan Karimi Galougahi; Tamim Nazif; Akiko Maehara; Mark A Hardy; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Michael B Collins; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Gregg W Stone; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Evan C Klein; Ridhima Kapoor; David Lewandowski; Peter J Mason
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Clinical utility of myocardial fatty acid imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Masato Nishimura; Toshihiko Ono
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Optimal method of coronary revascularization in patients receiving dialysis: systematic review.

Authors:  Immaculate F Nevis; Anna Mathew; Richard J Novick; Chirag R Parikh; Philip J Devereaux; Madhu K Natarajan; Arthur V Iansavichus; Meaghan S Cuerden; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 10.  Coronary Revascularization in Patients with CKD Stage 5D: Pragmatic Considerations.

Authors:  Gautam R Shroff; Charles A Herzog
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.