Literature DB >> 15451086

Cannabinoids in hair: strategy to prove marijuana/hashish consumption.

Michael Uhl1, Hans Sachs.   

Abstract

Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THCA) are equally used to indicate consumption of cannabis (hashish and marijuana). Publications of the early 90's demonstrate the possibilities of determining THC, cannabinol (CBN), and cannabidiol (CBD). All these substances are present in cannabis smoke and can be incorporated into the hair only by contamination. Generally, washing procedures should prevent false positive results, but finally it cannot be excluded that traces of THC may be found in hair after mere passive cannabis smoke exposure. Three authentic cases illustrate the problems originating in the exclusive determination of THC/CBN. The first example is the case of a couple living together in an apartment. Both persons' hair samples had been taken and gave positive results for THC and CBN. The male subject admitted smoking cannabis several times per day, but the female mate denied any consumption. Examination of the hair for THCA showed a high level (>6.6 pg/mg) in the sample of the male person and negative results (LOQ 0.1 pg/mg) in the sample of his mate. The second case hair is of a self admitted cannabis user's hair and was tested first by an immunoassay and GC/MS with a negative result. Nevertheless, the THCA concentration quantified in his sample was 2.7 pg/mg hair. The third hair sample is of a 2-year-old child that was tested positive for cannabis by using an immunochemical test. No THC and CBN were detectable by GC/MS, however, trace amounts of THCA using GC/MS/MS. A comparative study of hair samples (screening for cannabinoids using ELISA test, THC determination by GC/MS, THCA by GC/MS/MS) showed that only 26 segments of 66 were positive for both THC and THCA. Thirteen were negative for THC and positive for THCA, and six were positive for THC but negative for THCA. The cases were selected by an ELISA test or re-examined when the blood/urine results or the statement of the accused did not match with a THC outcome. The most appropriate strategy to prove cannabis consumption is immunochemical initial test followed by a GC/MS/MS confirmation of THCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451086     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  13 in total

1.  New developments on emerging organic pollutants in the atmosphere.

Authors:  Catia Balducci; Mattia Perilli; Paola Romagnoli; Angelo Cecinato
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Prenatal and postnatal cocaine exposure predict teen cocaine use.

Authors:  Virginia Delaney-Black; Lisa M Chiodo; John H Hannigan; Mark K Greenwald; James Janisse; Grace Patterson; Marilyn A Huestis; Robert T Partridge; Joel Ager; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.763

3.  Just say "I don't": lack of concordance between teen report and biological measures of drug use.

Authors:  Virginia Delaney-Black; Lisa M Chiodo; John H Hannigan; Mark K Greenwald; James Janisse; Grace Patterson; Marilyn A Huestis; Joel Ager; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Postmortem diagnosis and toxicological validation of illicit substance use.

Authors:  Elin Lehrmann; Zoan R Afanador; Amy Deep-Soboslay; Gloria Gallegos; William D Darwin; Ross H Lowe; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis; Jean L Cadet; Mary M Herman; Thomas M Hyde; Joel E Kleinman; William J Freed
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Interpretation of forensic cases based on empirical data.

Authors:  Michael Uhl; Frank Scheufler
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Cannabinoid concentrations in hair from documented cannabis users.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis; Richard A Gustafson; Eric T Moolchan; Allan Barnes; James A Bourland; Stacy A Sweeney; Eugene F Hayes; Patrick M Carpenter; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Comparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged men.

Authors:  David M Ledgerwood; Bruce A Goldberger; Nathan K Risk; Collins E Lewis; Rumi Kato Price
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Enzymatic digestion and selective quantification of underivatised delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cocaine in human hair using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Salah Eddine Breidi; James Barker; Andrea Petróczi; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption.

Authors:  Bjoern Moosmann; Nadine Roth; Volker Auwärter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessment of rates of recanting and hair testing as a biological measure of drug use in a general population sample of young people.

Authors:  Michelle Taylor; John Sullivan; Susan M Ring; John Macleod; Matthew Hickman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.