Literature DB >> 15450821

A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Edward H Livingston1, Robert V Rege.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the national incidence and risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.
BACKGROUND: Most series reporting the rates at which laparoscopic cholecystectomies are performed, relative to the open procedure, have come from centers specializing in laparoscopic surgery. The rates at which conversions occur from these centers may not reflect those in community practice. We sought to determine the actual, and therefore acceptable, conversion rate by examining nationally representative discharge data.
METHODS: The National Hospital Discharge database for 1998 to 2001 was acquired from the Centers for Disease Control. All gallbladder disease related admissions were extracted, and the cholecystectomies (ICD-9-CM codes 51.2X) were analyzed using the SAS package. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine what factors were associated with the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: Approximately 25% of all cholecystectomies are performed by the open technique. Of the remaining 75%, there is an approximately 5% to 10% conversion rate. The major risk factors for conversion included male sex, obesity, and cholecystitis. Concurrent choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis, and cholecystitis were associated with a conversion rate of 25%. Length of stay (LOS) was reduced for laparoscopic operations and although conversion added 2 to 3 days to the LOS, for most cases the LOS was still less than for primary open operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of all cholecystectomies are performed laparoscopically, and the national conversion rate is 5% to 10%. Cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, male sex, and obesity are major predictors for conversion. The data presented in terms of conversion rates and LOS were derived from population-adjusted hospital discharge data and represent the current U.S. experience for cholecystectomy. From these data the community experience for conversion rates, risk factors, and LOS can be derived. Copyright 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450821     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  97 in total

1.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Torben Horn; Sara D Christensen; Jakob Kirkegård; Lars P Larsen; Anders R Knudsen; Frank V Mortensen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A 10-step intraoperative surgical checklist (ISC) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-can it really reduce conversion rates to open cholecystectomy?

Authors:  William B Robb; Gavin A Falk; John O Larkin; Ronan Waldron; Ronan P Waldron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Amanda Johner; Adam Raymakers; Sam M Wiseman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the presence of common bile duct stent.

Authors:  Manojkumar S Nair; Mohammed Mohsin Uzzaman; Oladapo Fafemi; Anna Athow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early cholecystectomy after acute admission with cholecystitis: how much work?

Authors:  Michael R Stephens; Ceri Beaton; Adrian C Steger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Does ultrasongraphy predict intraoperative findings at cholecystectomy? An institutional review.

Authors:  Shannon Stogryn; Jennifer Metcalfe; Ashley Vergis; Krista Hardy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  "Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single Surgeon's Experience in some of the Teaching Hospitals of West Bengal".

Authors:  Prosanta Kumar Bhattacharjee; Shyamal Kumar Halder; Himanshu Rai; Rajendra Pd Ray
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Cystic duct pressures after ligation with a novel absorbable device in an ex vivo caprine cholecystectomy model.

Authors:  Andrea J Sundholm Tepper; Odd V Höglund; Bonnie G Campbell; Chi-Ya Chen; Boel A Fransson
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.