Literature DB >> 15450695

Effects of repeated electrocutaneous pain stimulation on facial blood flow.

Olav Vassend1, Stein Knardahl.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of repeated electrocutaneous pain stimulation of the hand on facial blood flow responses in healthy human subjects (58 adult women). Finger blood flow, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were also monitored. To investigate the influence of psychological factors, the subjects' affect states were assessed, and physiological responding was explored during cognitive distraction, i.e., when attention was turned away from the unpleasant stimulus. Consistently, electrocutaneous stimulation elicited vasodilatation in the cheek, together with finger vasoconstriction. This response pattern was evident even at non-painful stimulation intensities. The facial blood flow response showed habituation across stimulation trials and was largely unrelated to systemic cardiovascular changes, affect states, and attentional manipulation. These findings indicate (1) that the experimentally induced facial blood flow changes are part of a non-specific physiological response pattern elicited during noxious stimulation, and (2) that they are not dependent on regional (orofacial) stimulation for their occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15450695     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  3 in total

Review 1.  Autonomic arousal and experimentally induced pain: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Brandon Nicholas Kyle; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Understanding Monitoring Technologies for Adults With Pain: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Iyubanit Rodríguez; Valeria Herskovic; Carmen Gerea; Carolina Fuentes; Pedro O Rossel; Maíra Marques; Mauricio Campos
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness.

Authors:  Roel van Hooijdonk; Sebastiaan Mathot; Evelien Schat; Hannah Spencer; Stefan van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.