Literature DB >> 15450412

Basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage, DNA repair efficacy and mutagen sensitivity in breast cancer.

Janusz Blasiak1, Michal Arabski, Renata Krupa, Katarzyna Wozniak, Jan Rykala, Agnieszka Kolacinska, Zbigniew Morawiec, Jozef Drzewoski, Marek Zadrozny.   

Abstract

Impaired DNA repair may fuel up malignant transformation of breast cells due to the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in target genes and increasing susceptibility to exogenous carcinogens. Moreover, the effectiveness of DNA repair may contribute to failure of chemotherapy and resistance of breast cancer cells to drugs and radiation. The breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA repair. To evaluate further the role of DNA repair in breast cancer we determined: (1) the kinetics of removal of DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide and the anticancer drug doxorubicin, and (2) the level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage before and during/after chemotherapy in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. The level of DNA damage and the kinetics of DNA repair were evaluated by alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Oxidative and alkylative DNA damage were assayed with the use of DNA repair enzymes endonuclease III (Endo III) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), recognizing oxidized DNA bases and 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) recognizing alkylated bases. We observed slower kinetics of DNA repair after treatment with hydrogen peroxide and doxorubicin in lymphocytes of breast cancer patients compared to control individuals. The level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage was higher in breast cancer patients than in the control and the difference was more pronounced when patients after chemotherapy were engaged, but usually the level of DNA damage in these patients was too high to be measured with our system. Our results indicate that peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients have more damaged DNA and display decreased DNA repair efficacy. Therefore, these features can be considered as risk markers for breast cancer, but the question whether they are the cause or a consequence of the illness remains open. Nevertheless, our results suggest that research on the mutagen sensitivity and efficacy of DNA repair could impact the development of new diagnostic and screening strategies as well as indicate new targets to prevent and cure cancer. Moreover, the comet assay may be applied to evaluate the suitability of a particular mode of chemotherapy to a particular cancer patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450412     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  27 in total

1.  Radiosensitivity and repair kinetics of gamma-irradiated leukocytes from sporadic prostate cancer patients and healthy individuals assessed by alkaline comet assay.

Authors:  Maryam Shahidi; Hossein Mozdarani; Wolfgang-Ulrich Mueller
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes.

Authors:  Tim A Ahles; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Double-strand breaks repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from sisters discordant for breast cancer from the New York site of the BCFR.

Authors:  Nicola Machella; Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer Zipprich; Irina Gurvich; Yuyan Liao; Ruby T Senie; David O Kennedy; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Cognitive Effects of Chemotherapy and Cancer-Related Treatments in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer N Vega; Julie Dumas; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.105

5.  Alterations in brain structure and function in breast cancer survivors: effect of post-chemotherapy interval and relation to oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Susan K Conroy; Brenna C McDonald; Dori J Smith; Lyndsi R Moser; John D West; Lisa M Kamendulis; James E Klaunig; Victoria L Champion; Frederick W Unverzagt; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review.

Authors:  J Cara Pendergrass; Steven D Targum; John E Harrison
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 7.  BRCA1 Mutation: A Predictive Marker for Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Charlene Kan; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Geostatistical analysis of DNA damage in oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in Lavaca Bay, Texas.

Authors:  Wesley Bissett; Lauren Smith; James A Thompson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Geostatistical analysis of biomarkers of genotoxicity in cattle, Bos taurus and Bos taurus x Bos indicus, sentinels near industrial facilities.

Authors:  Wesley Bissett; Roger Smith; L Garry Adams; Robert Field; William Moyer; Tim Phillips; H Morgan Scott; James A Thompson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  The attenuation of early benzo(a)pyrene-induced carcinogenic insults by diallyl disulfide (DADS) in MCF-10A cells.

Authors:  Yasmeen M Nkrumah-Elie; Jayne S Reuben; Alicia M Hudson; Equar Taka; Ramesh Badisa; Tiffany Ardley; Bridg'ette Israel; Sakeenah Y Sadrud-Din; Ebenezer T Oriaku; Selina F Darling-Reed
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.