Literature DB >> 15450005

Assessment of glycemic control by continuous glucose monitoring system in 50 children with type 1 diabetes starting on insulin pump therapy.

Dorothee Deiss1, Reinhard Hartmann, Julia Hoeffe, Olga Kordonouri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report experience with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to identify factors influencing glycemic control in a large cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and change to insulin pump therapy via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 50 patients [21 boys, 29 girls; median age 12.6 yr (range: 1.3-16.4 yr); diabetes duration 5.0 yr (0.2-13.3)], hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and ambulatory CGMS were performed before and 6 wk after starting CSII. Average glucose concentration per 24 h, during day and night time as well as number of excursions, duration, and area under the curve (AUC) of glucose values above 180 mg/dL and below 60 mg/dL were calculated from CGMS data. Simultaneously, metabolic control was documented by standardized self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
RESULTS: In the total cohort, HbA1c improved from 8.1 +/- 1.2% at baseline to 7.7 +/- 0.9% after 6 wk of CSII (p <0.001). This effect was more distinct in boys (8.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.1%, p=0.007) than in girls (8.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.7%, p=0.039) as well as in patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.0%) at baseline (8.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.8%, p <0.001) and in those older than 12 yr (8.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 7.7 +/- 1.0%, p <0.001). At 6 wk of CSII, the values of glucose average per 24 h, AUC and time above 180 mg/dL, particularly during the day, improved. HbA1c was correlated with AUC above 180 mg/dL (r=0.742, p <0.001) and CGMS average glucose per 24 h (r=0.628, p=0.002), but to a lesser extent with SMBG values (r=0.418, p=0.054).
CONCLUSION: With the change to CSII, HbA1c improved significantly after 6 wk of therapy. CGMS usage provided additional information about glycemic control in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450005     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2004.00053.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  8 in total

1.  A Comparison of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion vs. Multiple Daily Insulin Injection in Children with Type I Diabetes in Kuwait: Glycemic Control, Insulin Requirement, and BMI.

Authors:  Mohammad Mousa; Maria Al-Mahdi; Hala Al-Sanaa; Hessa Al-Kandari
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-09

2.  Do high blood glucose peaks contribute to higher HbA1c? Results from repeated continuous glucose measurements in children.

Authors:  Samuelsson Ulf; Hanas Ragnar; Whiss Per Arne; Ludvigsson Johnny
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Practical experience with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in a pediatric diabetes clinic.

Authors:  Michele A O'Connell; Fergus J Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01

Review 4.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D T Golicki; D Golicka; L Groele; E Pankowska
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Robert Henry Slover
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Improving the estimation of mealtime insulin dose in adults with type 1 diabetes: the Normal Insulin Demand for Dose Adjustment (NIDDA) study.

Authors:  Jiansong Bao; Heather R Gilbertson; Robyn Gray; Diane Munns; Gabrielle Howard; Peter Petocz; Stephen Colagiuri; Jennie C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Polymorphic basal rates of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion among Taiwanese children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Lin; Feng-Ju Hsieh; Yang-Hau Van; Fu-Sung Lo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of glucose monitoring methods during steady-state exercise in women.

Authors:  Stefanie J Herrington; David L Gee; Shireen D Dow; Keith A Monosky; Erika Davis; Kelly L Pritchett
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.