Literature DB >> 1545000

Decreased morbidity associated with retroperitoneal exclusion treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

R C Darling1, D M Shah, W R McClellan, B B Chang, R P Leather.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized study has been carried out to compare the retroperitoneal (RP) and the transperitoneal (TP) approaches to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). From November 1988 to July 1989, 27 patients were randomized to one or the other group. Twelve patients underwent TP resection of their AAA; 11 of these were performed using the open aneurysmorrhaphy technique. The RP approach was used in 15 patients, 12 of whom had the exclusion technique performed. Enteral feeding was resumed on the second postoperative day in the RP group compared to the fourth postoperative day in the TP group; the difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.02). Statistically significant differences were also present in the estimated blood loss (516 cc in the RP group versus 1127 cc in the TP group) in the blood transfusion requirement (p less than 0.05). This prospective randomized study comparing TP and RP approaches to AAA showed that the RPE approach had less blood loss, less transfusion requirement, and earlier resumption of enteral feeding than the TP approach. We feel the RPE technique is safe and efficient in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1545000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  7 in total

1.  Endoluminal graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients and octogenarians: is it better than open repair?

Authors:  G A Sicard; B G Rubin; L A Sanchez; C A Keller; M W Flye; D Picus; D Hovsepian; E T Choi; P J Geraghty; R W Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Transabdominal open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission compared with the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Sara L Zettervall; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Philip P Goodney; Fred A Weaver; Pedro G Teixeira; Virendra I Patel; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Respiratory function after aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison between retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches.

Authors:  Carlo A Volta; Enrico Ferri; Elisabetta Marangoni; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Verri; Valentina Alvisi; Silvia Zardi; Sara Bertacchini; Gaetano Gritti; Raffaele Alvisi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches.

Authors:  C Darling; D M Shah; B B Chang; P S Paty; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Pete A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Mark Wyers; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Total retroperitoneal approach to aortic reconstruction: A novel technique for aorto-enteric fistulae and graft infections.

Authors:  Abdullah Alfawaz; Jun Tashiro; Danny Sleeman; Keith Jones; Jorge Rey
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-27

7.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Fan Mei; Kaiyan Hu; Bing Zhao; Qianqian Gao; Fei Chen; Li Zhao; Mei Wu; Liyuan Feng; Zhe Wang; Jinwei Yang; Weiyi Zhang; Bin Ma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.