Oyvind Kirkevold1, Leiv Sandvik, Knut Engedal. 1. Norwegian Centre for Dementia Research, Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust, Tønsberg N-3107, Norway. oyvind.kirkevold@nordemens.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of patient and ward characteristics on the use of constraints in nursing homes. METHOD: Primary carers in 222 wards in Norwegian nursing homes were asked about use of constraints towards 1926 patients during seven days. Constraints were grouped as mechanical restraints, non-mechanical restraints, electronic surveillance, force or pressure in medical examination or treatment, and force or pressure in ADL. The patients' mental capacity (CDR score), activity in daily living (ADL) and behaviour (BARS score) were rated. Type and size of ward, staffing level and educational level of the staff was recorded. RESULTS: In all 758 of the patients were subjected to any constraint. Degree of dementia, aggressive behaviour and loss of function in ADL had significant impact on all types of constraint except for electronical surveillance. The strongest associations were found between degree of dementia and mechanical restraint (OR 5.14), impaired ADL and mechanical restraint (OR 9.23) and aggression and force or pressure in ADL (OR 3.75). Mechanical restraint was less used towards patients in special care units for persons with dementia (SCU) (OR 0.38) compared to patients in regular units (RU), whereas non-mechanical restraint was more frequent used in SCUs (OR 2.28). Type of ward had no significant impact on use of other types of constraints. Staff level and education level of the staff had no significant impact on the use of constraint. CONCLUSION: Constraint is frequently used in nursing homes, and most frequent toward patients with severe dementia, aggressive behaviour or low ADL function.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of patient and ward characteristics on the use of constraints in nursing homes. METHOD: Primary carers in 222 wards in Norwegian nursing homes were asked about use of constraints towards 1926 patients during seven days. Constraints were grouped as mechanical restraints, non-mechanical restraints, electronic surveillance, force or pressure in medical examination or treatment, and force or pressure in ADL. The patients' mental capacity (CDR score), activity in daily living (ADL) and behaviour (BARS score) were rated. Type and size of ward, staffing level and educational level of the staff was recorded. RESULTS: In all 758 of the patients were subjected to any constraint. Degree of dementia, aggressive behaviour and loss of function in ADL had significant impact on all types of constraint except for electronical surveillance. The strongest associations were found between degree of dementia and mechanical restraint (OR 5.14), impaired ADL and mechanical restraint (OR 9.23) and aggression and force or pressure in ADL (OR 3.75). Mechanical restraint was less used towards patients in special care units for persons with dementia (SCU) (OR 0.38) compared to patients in regular units (RU), whereas non-mechanical restraint was more frequent used in SCUs (OR 2.28). Type of ward had no significant impact on use of other types of constraints. Staff level and education level of the staff had no significant impact on the use of constraint. CONCLUSION: Constraint is frequently used in nursing homes, and most frequent toward patients with severe dementia, aggressive behaviour or low ADL function.
Authors: Zhanlian Feng; John P Hirdes; Trevor F Smith; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Iris Chi; Jean-Noel Du Pasquier; Ruedi Gilgen; Naoki Ikegami; Vincent Mor Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.485