Literature DB >> 15448492

Goldmann tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison between retreated and nonretreated patients.

Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno1, Antonio Lleó-Pérez, Saleh M Rahhal, Luis Alonso.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify differences in applanation tonometry between retreated and nonretreated eyes (primary LASIK eyes) 6 months after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
METHODS: In a prospective study 100 eyes (100 patients) underwent conventional hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis under a 160-microm flap. Central Goldmann applanation tonometry was determined before and 6 months after surgery in 78 (78%) primary LASIK eyes and before surgery and 6 months after the retreatment date in 22 (22%) retreated eyes.
RESULTS: Preoperative mean tonometry was 14.96 +/- 1.96 mm Hg and 15.30 +/- 1.95 mm Hg in primary LASIK and retreated eyes, respectively. Six months after surgery it was 12.99 +/- 2.03 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and 12.67 +/- 2.20 mm Hg (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences in mean tonometry were found between retreated and primary LASIK eyes 6 months after surgery (P = 0.537). Decreased tonometric values were found in 20 retreated eyes (90.91%) and in 62 primary LASIK eyes (79.48%). Increased tonometric values higher than 1 mm Hg were found in 3 primary LASIK eyes (3.84%), but no retreated eyes showed increased values 6 months after surgery. Two retreated eyes (9.09%) and 10 primary LASIK eyes (79.49%) presented the same tonometric values before surgery and at the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: After hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis there was no significant difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry between retreated and primary LASIK eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15448492     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000130189.95297.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  2 in total

1.  Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.

Authors:  Antonios P Aristeidou; Georgios Labiris; Andreas Katsanos; Michalis Fanariotis; Nikitas C Foudoulakis; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Complication cascade after hyperopic LASIK].

Authors:  D M Handzel; B V Stanzel; S Briesen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.