Literature DB >> 15448407

Bioactivity of ceramic-polymer composites with varied composition and surface topography.

S M Rea1, S M Best, W Bonfield.   

Abstract

HAPEX trade mark (40 vol % hydroxyapatite in a high-density polyethylene matrix) and AWPEX (40 vol % glass-ceramic apatite-wollastonite in a high-density polyethylene matrix) are composites designed to provide bioactivity and to match the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. HAPEX trade mark has had clinical success in middle ear and orbital implants, and there is great potential for further orthopaedic applications of these materials. However, more detailed in vitro investigations must be performed to better understand the biological interactions of the composites. In this study, the bioactivity of each material was assessed. Specifically, the effects of controlled surface topography and ceramic filler composition on apatite layer formation in acellular simulated body fluid (SBF) with ion concentration similar to those of human blood plasma were examined. Samples were prepared as 1 x 10 x 10 mm(3) tiles with polished, roughened or parallel-grooved surface finishes, and were incubated in 20 ml of SBF at 36.5 degrees C for one, three, seven or 14 days. The formation of an apatite layer on the composite surface after immersion was demonstrated by thin-film X-ray diffraction, environmental scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Variations in sample weight and solution pH over the period of incubation were also recorded. Significant differences were found between the two materials tested, with greater bioactivity in AWPEX than HAPEX trade mark. Results also showed surface topography to be important, with rougher samples correlated to earlier apatite formation. Osteoblast-like cells proliferated favourably on both composite materials, with many filopodia connections, preferential attachment to ceramic particles and contact guidance effects evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15448407     DOI: 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000042685.63383.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  16 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  D A Puleo; A Nanci
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Initial attachment of osteoblasts to an optimised HAPEX topography.

Authors:  M J Dalby; M V Kayser; W Bonfield; L Di Silvio
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.

Authors:  J E Davies
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1996-06

4.  Behaviour of fibroblast-like cells on grooved surfaces.

Authors:  Y A Rovensky; I L Slavnaja; J M Vasiliev
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Diagnostic value of effluent endotoxin level in gram-negative peritonitis in CAPD patients.

Authors:  K O Muhammed; Q Ozener; E Akoglu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Biodegradable polymer/hydroxyapatite composites: surface analysis and initial attachment of human osteoblasts.

Authors:  S C Rizzi; D J Heath; A G Coombes; N Bock; M Textor; S Downes
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-06-15

7.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W.

Authors:  T Kokubo; H Kushitani; S Sakka; T Kitsugi; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-06

8.  In vitro mechanical and biological assessment of hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene composite.

Authors:  J Huang; L Di Silvio; M Wang; K E Tanner; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Silicon: a possible factor in bone calcification.

Authors:  E M Carlisle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mechanical properties of glass-ceramic A-W-polyethylene composites: effect of filler content and particle size.

Authors:  J A Juhasz; S M Best; R Brooks; M Kawashita; N Miyata; T Kokubo; T Nakamura; W Bonfield
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  7 in total

1.  An in vitro study of electrically active hydroxyapatite-barium titanate ceramics using Saos-2 cells.

Authors:  Frances R Baxter; Irene G Turner; Christopher R Bowen; Jonathan P Gittings; Julian B Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials based on calcium orthophosphates.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Bioactive ceramic-reinforced composites for bone augmentation.

Authors:  K E Tanner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Mechanical, rheological, and bioactivity properties of ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene bioactive composites containing polyethylene glycol and hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Mazatusziha Ahmad; Mat Uzir Wahit; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Khairul Zaman Mohd Dahlan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-30

5.  Density functional calculations of the properties of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  H F Chappell; P D Bristowe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.727

6.  Injectable polypeptide hydrogel/inorganic nanoparticle composites for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Wei-Shun Huang; I-Ming Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Lutz-Christian Gerhardt; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.