C Lawrence Kien1, Figen Ugrasbul. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch and the Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, TX, USA. clkien@utmb.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During feeding trials, it is useful to predict daily energy expenditure (DEE) to estimate energy requirements and to assess subject compliance. OBJECTIVE: We examined predictors of DEE during a feeding trial conducted in a clinical research center. DESIGN: During a 28-d period, all food consumed by 26 healthy, nonobese, young adults was provided by the investigators. Energy intake was adjusted to maintain constant body weight. Before and after this period, fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass were assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and DEE was estimated from the change (after - before) in body energy (DeltaBE) and in observed energy intake (EI): DEE = EI - DeltaBE. We examined the relation of DEE to pretrial resting energy expenditure (REE), FFM, REE derived from the average of REE and calculated from FFM [REE = (21.2 x FFM) + 415], and an estimate of DEE based on the Harris-Benedict equation (HB estimate) (DEE = 1.6 REE). RESULTS: DEE correlated (P < 0.001) with FFM (r = 0.78), REE (r = 0.73), average REE (r = 0.82), and the HB estimate (r = 0.81). In a multiple regression model containing all these variables, R(2) was 0.70. The mean (+/-SEM) ratios of DEE to REE, to average REE, and to the HB estimate were 1.86 +/- 0.06, 1.79 +/- 0.04, and 1.02 +/- 0.02, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although a slightly improved prediction of DEE is possible with multiple measurements, each of these measurements suggests that DEE equals 1.60-1.86 x REE. The findings are similar to those of previous studies that describe the relation of REE to DEE measured directly.
BACKGROUND: During feeding trials, it is useful to predict daily energy expenditure (DEE) to estimate energy requirements and to assess subject compliance. OBJECTIVE: We examined predictors of DEE during a feeding trial conducted in a clinical research center. DESIGN: During a 28-d period, all food consumed by 26 healthy, nonobese, young adults was provided by the investigators. Energy intake was adjusted to maintain constant body weight. Before and after this period, fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass were assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and DEE was estimated from the change (after - before) in body energy (DeltaBE) and in observed energy intake (EI): DEE = EI - DeltaBE. We examined the relation of DEE to pretrial resting energy expenditure (REE), FFM, REE derived from the average of REE and calculated from FFM [REE = (21.2 x FFM) + 415], and an estimate of DEE based on the Harris-Benedict equation (HB estimate) (DEE = 1.6 REE). RESULTS: DEE correlated (P < 0.001) with FFM (r = 0.78), REE (r = 0.73), average REE (r = 0.82), and the HB estimate (r = 0.81). In a multiple regression model containing all these variables, R(2) was 0.70. The mean (+/-SEM) ratios of DEE to REE, to average REE, and to the HB estimate were 1.86 +/- 0.06, 1.79 +/- 0.04, and 1.02 +/- 0.02, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although a slightly improved prediction of DEE is possible with multiple measurements, each of these measurements suggests that DEE equals 1.60-1.86 x REE. The findings are similar to those of previous studies that describe the relation of REE to DEE measured directly.
Authors: S W Lichtman; K Pisarska; E R Berman; M Pestone; H Dowling; E Offenbacher; H Weisel; S Heshka; D E Matthews; S B Heymsfield Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-12-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Lawrence Kien; Karen I Everingham; Robert D Stevens; Naomi K Fukagawa; Deborah M Muoio Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Young-Min Park; Amy C Keller; Shauna S Runchey; Benjamin F Miller; Wendy M Kohrt; Rachael E Van Pelt; Chounghun Kang; Catherine M Jankowski; Kerrie L Moreau Journal: Steroids Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: E Whitney Evans; Richard B Lipton; B Lee Peterlin; Hollie A Raynor; J Graham Thomas; Kevin C O'Leary; Jelena Pavlovic; Rena R Wing; Dale S Bond Journal: Headache Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: R I Pereira; B A Casey; T A Swibas; C B Erickson; P Wolfe; R E Van Pelt Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Todd A Hagobian; Carrie G Sharoff; Brooke R Stephens; George N Wade; J Enrique Silva; Stuart R Chipkin; Barry Braun Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Saskia W van den Berg; Daphne L van der A; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Mariken J Tijhuis; Pilar Amiano; Eva Ardanaz; Joline W J Beulens; Heiner Boeing; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Francesca L Crowe; Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Heinz Freisling; Carlos Gonzalez; Sara Grioni; Jytte Halkjaer; José María Huerta; Inge Huybrechts; Rudolf Kaaks; Kay Tee Khaw; Giovanna Masala; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Salvatore Panico; J Ramón Quirós; Olov Rolandsson; Carlotta Sacerdote; María-José Sánchez; Matthias B Schulze; Nadia Slimani; Ellen A Struijk; Anne Tjonneland; Rosario Tumino; Stephen J Sharp; Claudia Langenberg; Nita G Forouhi; Edith J M Feskens; Elio Riboli; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240