Literature DB >> 15447049

Influence of dose rate on the induction of simple and complex chromosome exchanges by gamma rays.

Bradford D Loucas1, Richard Eberle, Susan M Bailey, Michael N Cornforth.   

Abstract

Single-color painting of whole chromosomes, or protocols in which only a few chromosomes are distinctively painted, will always fail to detect a proportion of complex exchanges because they frequently produce pseudosimple painting patterns that are indistinguishable from those produced by bona fide simple exchanges. When 24-color multi-fluor FISH (mFISH) was employed for the purpose of distinguishing (truly) simple from pseudosimple exchanges, it was confirmed that the acute low-LET radiation dose-response relationship for simple exchanges lacked significant upward curvature. This result has been interpreted to indicate that the formation of simple exchanges requires only one chromosome locus be damaged (e.g. broken) by radiation to initiate an exchange-not two, as classical cytogenetic theory maintains. Because a one-lesion mechanism implies single-track action, it follows that the production of simple exchanges should not be influenced by changes in dose rate. To examine this prediction, we irradiated noncycling primary human fibroblasts with graded doses of (137)Cs gamma rays at an acute dose rate of 1.10 Gy/min and compared, using mFISH, the yield of simple exchanges to that observed after exposure to the same radiation delivered at a chronic dose rate of 0.08 cGy/min. The shape of the dose response was found to be quasi-linear for both dose rates, but, counter to providing support for a one-lesion mechanism, the yield of simple aberrations was greatly reduced by protracted exposure. Although chronic doses were delivered at rates low enough to produce damage exclusively by single-track action, this did not altogether eliminate the formation of complex aberrations, an analysis of which leads to the conclusion that a single track of low-LET radiation is capable of inducing complex exchanges requiring up to four proximate breaks for their formation. For acute exposures, the ratio of simple reciprocal translocations to simple dicentrics was near unity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Radiation Health; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15447049     DOI: 10.1667/rr3245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  15 in total

1.  Dose-rate effects of protons on in vivo activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and cytokines in mouse bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Louise Honikel; Adam Rusek; Sanford R Simon
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A mouse model of cytogenetic analysis to evaluate caesium137 radiation dose exposure and contamination level in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Sandrine Roch-Lefèvre; Cécile Martin-Bodiot; Eric Grégoire; Aurélie Desbrée; Laurence Roy; Joan Francesc Barquinero
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Directional genomic hybridization: inversions as a potential biodosimeter for retrospective radiation exposure.

Authors:  F Andrew Ray; Erin Robinson; Miles McKenna; Megumi Hada; Kerry George; Francis Cucinotta; Edwin H Goodwin; Joel S Bedford; Susan M Bailey; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Defining chromosomal translocation risks in cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Hogenbirk; Marinus R Heideman; Iris de Rink; Arno Velds; Ron M Kerkhoven; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Heinz Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Systematic review of experimental studies on the relative biological effectiveness of tritium.

Authors:  M P Little; B E Lambert
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view.

Authors:  D J Shah; R K Sachs; D J Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: a discussion in the light of radiological protection.

Authors:  Werner Rühm; Gayle E Woloschak; Roy E Shore; Tamara V Azizova; Bernd Grosche; Ohtsura Niwa; Suminori Akiba; Tetsuya Ono; Keiji Suzuki; Toshiyasu Iwasaki; Nobuhiko Ban; Michiaki Kai; Christopher H Clement; Simon Bouffler; Hideki Toma; Nobuyuki Hamada
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  The LET dependence of unrepaired chromosome damage in human cells: a break too far?

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Chromosome damage in human cells by γ rays, α particles and heavy ions: track interactions in basic dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Marco Durante; Susan M Bailey; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.