Literature DB >> 15446844

Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients.

Martin Whittle1, Valerie J Gillet, Peter Willett, Alexander Alex, Jens Loesel.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of various similarity coefficients for 2D similarity searching when multiple bioactive target structures are available. Similarity searches using several different activity classes within the MDL Drug Data Report and the Dictionary of Natural Products databases are performed using BCI 2D fingerprints. Using data fusion techniques to combine the resulting nearest neighbor lists we obtain group recall results which, in many cases, are a considerable improvement on standard average recall values obtained for individual structures. It is shown that the degree of improvement can be related to the structural diversity of the activity class that is searched for, the best results being found for the most diverse groups. The group recall of active compounds using subsets of the class is also investigated: for highly self-similar activity classes, the group recall improvement saturates well before the full activity class size is reached. A rough correlation is found between the relative improvement using the group recall and the square of the number of unique compounds available in all of the merged lists. The Tanimoto coefficient is found unambiguously to be the best coefficient to use for the recovery of active compounds using multiple targets. Furthermore, when using the Tanimoto coefficient, the "MAX" fusion rule is found to be more effective than the "SUM" rule for the combination of similarity searches from multiple targets. The use of group recall can lead to improved enrichment in database searches and virtual screening. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446844     DOI: 10.1021/ci049867x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci        ISSN: 0095-2338


  19 in total

1.  Charting biologically relevant chemical space: a structural classification of natural products (SCONP).

Authors:  Marcus A Koch; Ansgar Schuffenhauer; Michael Scheck; Stefan Wetzel; Marco Casaulta; Alex Odermatt; Peter Ertl; Herbert Waldmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications.

Authors:  Ana G Maldonado; J P Doucet; Michel Petitjean; Bo-Tao Fan
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 3.  Evaluation of machine-learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Beining Chen; Robert F Harrison; George Papadatos; Peter Willett; David J Wood; Xiao Qing Lewell; Paulette Greenidge; Nikolaus Stiefl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Indirect similarity based methods for effective scaffold-hopping in chemical compounds.

Authors:  Nikil Wale; Ian A Watson; George Karypis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Do We Build Similar Molecules for Comorbid Diseases? Tevarud in Drug Design, an Analysis for Depression and Inflammation.

Authors:  F Esra Önen Bayram; Sarah A A Alradhwani; Gulcin Tugcu; Hande Sipahi
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Brainstorming: weighted voting prediction of inhibitors for protein targets.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 7.  Molecular networks in drug discovery.

Authors:  John Kenneth Morrow; Longzhang Tian; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

8.  Target fishing for chemical compounds using target-ligand activity data and ranking based methods.

Authors:  Nikil Wale; George Karypis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Identifying compound-target associations by combining bioactivity profile similarity search and public databases mining.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Multiple search methods for similarity-based virtual screening: analysis of search overlap and precision.

Authors:  John D Holliday; Evangelos Kanoulas; Nurul Malim; Peter Willett
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.