Literature DB >> 15446518

Allograft bone in two-stage revision of the hip for infection. Is it safe?

P Ammon1, I Stockley.   

Abstract

A two-stage procedure was carried out on 57 patients with confirmed infection in a hip replacement. Allograft bone was used in the second stage. Pathogenic organisms were identified in all patients. In stage 1, the prosthesis was removed together with infected tissue. Antibiotics were added to customised cement beads. Systemic antibiotics were not used. At the second stage, 45 of the patients had either acetabular impaction grafting, femoral impaction grafting or a combination; 12 had a massive allograft. Eight patients suffered recurrent infection (14%), in six with the original infecting organism. The risk factors for re-infection were multiple previous procedures and highly resistant organisms. We believe that systemic antibiotic therapy should be considered for these patients. Allograft bone is shown to be a useful adjunct in most infected hip replacements with considerable loss of bone stock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446518     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  14 in total

1.  Structural allograft as an option for treating infected hip arthroplasty with massive bone loss.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Robert A Clayton; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Reconstruction of metadiaphyseal bone defects of the femur with cortical strut allografts in periprosthetic bone loss].

Authors:  G Orfanos; Y Ding; C P Bode; B Barden; J G Fitzek
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic infections using antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers of various types and materials.

Authors:  Katsufumi Uchiyama; Naonobu Takahira; Kensuke Fukushima; Mitsutoshi Moriya; Takeaki Yamamoto; Yojiro Minegishi; Rina Sakai; Moritoshi Itoman; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-07

4.  Biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis expressing vancomycin resistance early after adhesion to a metal surface.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakimura; Shiro Kajiyama; Shinji Adachi; Ko Chiba; Akihiko Yonekura; Masato Tomita; Hironobu Koseki; Takashi Miyamoto; Toshiyuki Tsurumoto; Makoto Osaki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections.

Authors:  Sunil Gurpur Kini; Ayman Gabr; Rishi Das; Mohamed Sukeik; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 6.  Allograft Bone as Antibiotic Carrier.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler; Peter Haiden
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2017-01-01

Review 7.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Reduced re-infection rates with postoperative oral antibiotics after two-stage revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Michael G Zywiel; Lynne C Jones; Ronald E Delanois; D Alex Stroh; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Vancomycin iontophoresis of allograft bone.

Authors:  M C Edmondson; R Day; D Wood
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.