Literature DB >> 15446494

Morbidity effects on productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing in the Southern Plains.

W E Pinchak1, D R Tolleson, M McCloy, L J Hunt, R J Gill, R J Ansley, S J Bevers.   

Abstract

Effects of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) on stocker cattle systems are unknown under extensive rangeland environments. Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that BRD-based morbidity is a major factor affecting the productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing Southern Plains rangelands. In Exp. 1 (658 male calves; average BW = 231 kg), 17% of the cattle were treated for BRD <8 d, 6% for 8 to 14 d, and 8% for >14 d. Morbid cattle had lower ADG than did healthy cattle (P < 0.10). Cattle requiring 14 d of pharmaceutical therapy gained less than cattle having <14 d therapy (P < 0.01). In Exp. 2, (279 steers and bulls; average BW = 216 kg), the ADG by steers (0.74 kg x animal(-1) x d(-1)) was greater (P < 0.05) than by bulls castrated after arrival (0.64 kg x animal(-1) x d(-1)). Castration after arrival led to a 13.5% loss in daily gain and a 10.3% loss in season-long gain. More (P < 0.05) bulls castrated after arrival (60%) were morbid compared with steers (28%). In Exp. 3, 633 heifers (average BW = 251 kg) were used to test the effects of morbidity on weight gain and reproduction. Heifers with lower initial weights exhibited increased (P < 0.05) morbidity. Heifers requiring two or more antibiotic treatments gained 0.03 kg/d less (P < 0.10) than did healthy heifers and had lower (P < 0.05) conception rates (66 vs. 81%). Conception rate in twice-treated heifers was 19% less than healthy heifers. Morbid heifers conceived 0.6 mo later (P < 0.05) than healthy heifers. Under the conditions of Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, morbidity decreased net returns 9.7 to 21.3% per animal. Adjusted gross returns per animal in Exp. 3 for replacement heifers were 3 to 7.8% less for morbid heifers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446494     DOI: 10.2527/2004.8292773x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: What is the evidence for predisposing factors?

Authors:  Jared D Taylor; Robert W Fulton; Terry W Lehenbauer; Douglas L Step; Anthony W Confer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Characterization and comparison of cell-mediated immune responses following ex vivo stimulation with viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens in stressed and unstressed beef calves1.

Authors:  Veronica M Buhler; Kaycee R Cash; David J Hurley; Brent C Credille
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Evaluation of statistical process control procedures to monitor feeding behavior patterns and detect onset of bovine respiratory disease in growing bulls.

Authors:  William C Kayser; Gordon E Carstens; Kirby S Jackson; William E Pinchak; Amarnath Banerjee; Yu Fu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Comparative efficacy of enrofloxacin to that of tulathromycin for the control of bovine respiratory disease and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica in calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  S Crosby; B Credille; S Giguère; R Berghaus
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  A Review of UK-Registered and Candidate Vaccines for Bovine Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Joanne L Lemon; Michael J McMenamy
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.