Literature DB >> 15446432

Does viviparity evolve in cold climate reptiles because pregnant females maintain stable (not high) body temperatures?

Richard Shine1.   

Abstract

Viviparity (live bearing) has evolved from egg laying (oviparity) in many lineages of lizards and snakes, apparently in response to occupancy of cold climates. Explanations for this pattern have focused on the idea that behaviorally thermoregulating (sun-basking) pregnant female reptiles can maintain higher incubation temperatures for their embryos than would be available in nests under the soil surface. This is certainly true at very high elevations, where only viviparous species occur. However, comparisons of nest and lizard temperatures at sites close to the upper elevational limit for oviparous reptiles (presumably, the selective environment where the transition from oviparity to viviparity actually occurs) suggest that reproductive mode has less effect on mean incubation temperatures than on the diel distribution of those temperatures. Nests of the oviparous scincid lizard Bassiana duperreyi showed smooth diel cycles of heating and cooling. In contrast, body temperatures of the viviparous scincid Eulamprus heatwolei rose abruptly in the morning, were high and stable during daylight hours, and fell abruptly at night. Laboratory incubation experiments mimicking these patterns showed that developmental rates of eggs and phenotypic traits of hatchling B. duperreyi were sensitive to this type of thermal variance as well as to mean temperature. Hence, diel distributions as well as mean incubation temperatures may have played an important role in the selective forces for viviparity. More generally, variances as well as mean values of abiotic factors may constitute significant selective forces on life-history evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446432     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00463.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Volatile fatty acid and aldehyde abundances evolve with behavior and habitat temperature in Sceloporus lizards.

Authors:  Stephanie M Campos; Jake A Pruett; Helena A Soini; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega; Jay K Goldberg; Cuauhcihuatl Vital-García; Diana K Hews; Milos V Novotny; Emília P Martins
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Slow life histories in lizards living in the highlands of the Andes Mountains.

Authors:  Jorgelina M Boretto; Facundo Cabezas-Cartes; Nora R Ibargüengoytía
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Alternative reproductive adaptations predict asymmetric responses to climate change in lizards.

Authors:  Manuel Jara; Roberto García-Roa; Luis E Escobar; Omar Torres-Carvajal; Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Understanding the evolution of viviparity using intraspecific variation in reproductive mode and transitional forms of pregnancy.

Authors:  Camilla M Whittington; James U Van Dyke; Stephanie Q T Liang; Scott V Edwards; Richard Shine; Michael B Thompson; Catherine E Grueber
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-01-30

5.  Heat tolerance during embryonic development has not diverged among populations of a widespread species (Sceloporus undulatus).

Authors:  Michael J Angilletta; Maximilian H Zelic; Gregory J Adrian; Alex M Hurliman; Colton D Smith
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  Why are some species older than others? A large-scale study of vertebrates.

Authors:  Laure Cattin; Johan Schuerch; Nicolas Salamin; Sylvain Dubey
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Evidence of positive selection associated with placental loss in tiger sharks.

Authors:  Dominic G Swift; Luke T Dunning; Javier Igea; Edward J Brooks; Catherine S Jones; Leslie R Noble; Adam Ciezarek; Emily Humble; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.