Literature DB >> 1544080

Revaccination of children during school-based measles outbreaks: potential impact of a new policy recommendation.

J W Osterman1, D Melnychuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of revaccination on measles outbreak control during school-based epidemics.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Thirty-two public elementary and high schools in 14 communities on the west island of Montreal. PARTICIPANTS: All 19,439 children attending these schools during the 1989 measles epidemic in Quebec. INTERVENTION: After notification of a case children with provider-verified records of vaccination on or after their first birthday were identified; the remaining children were vaccinated or excluded from school. OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical or confirmed measles cases not prevented by this intervention that could have been prevented had revaccination been included during the outbreak.
RESULTS: Of the 88 measles cases (74 confirmed) proof of one adequate vaccination was present in 48 (55%). Intervention generally occurred within 5 school days after case notification. The nonpreventable cases involved 75 children who had measles onset before the intervention and 11 (7 vaccinated) who had onset within 8 days after the intervention. The two remaining cases occurred 20 and 25 days after the intervention among nonvaccinated students who refused to be vaccinated. Except for these two cases measles was eliminated at every school. Application of the new Canadian guidelines for measles outbreak control would have required the administration of at least 10,000 additional doses during the outbreak to students vaccinated before 1980; implementation of the new US guidelines would have required the administration of 16,629 additional doses to children previously vaccinated only once. Well-enforced provincial regulations ensuring vaccination of every student upon school entry might have prevented 38 (43%) of the cases. The US recommendation of two routine doses of vaccine before school entry might have prevented 86 (98%) of the cases. However, revaccination during the outbreak would not have prevented a single additional case.
CONCLUSION: Revaccination of previously vaccinated students during a measles outbreak would have been costly and of little benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1544080      PMCID: PMC1488626     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Update: measles outbreak--Chicago, 1989.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1990-05-18       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Risk factors for measles in a previously vaccinated population and cost-effectiveness of revaccination strategies.

Authors:  E E Mast; J L Berg; L P Hanrahan; J T Wassell; J P Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Measles one more time.

Authors:  P A Brunell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement.

Authors:  B S Hersh; L E Markowitz; R E Hoffman; D R Hoff; M J Doran; J C Fleishman; S R Preblud; W A Orenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The role of secondary vaccine failures in measles outbreaks.

Authors:  R G Mathias; W G Meekison; T A Arcand; M T Schechter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures.

Authors:  B M Nkowane; S W Bart; W A Orenstein; M Baltier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A school-based measles outbreak: the effect of a selective revaccination policy and risk factors for vaccine failure.

Authors:  S S Hutchins; L E Markowitz; P Mead; D Mixon; J Sheline; N Greenberg; S R Preblud; W A Orenstein; H F Hull
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Continuing measles transmission in students despite school-based outbreak control program.

Authors:  S G Wassilak; W A Orenstein; P L Strickland; C A Butler; K J Bart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures.

Authors:  R M Davis; E D Whitman; W A Orenstein; S R Preblud; L E Markowitz; A R Hinman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  3 in total

1.  Twice vaccinated recipients are better protected against epidemic measles than are single dose recipients of measles containing vaccine.

Authors:  M Paunio; H Peltola; M Valle; I Davidkin; M Virtanen; O P Heinonen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Outbreak of measles in a highly vaccinated secondary school population.

Authors:  P A Sutcliffe; E Rea
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy.

Authors:  L Yuan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.