Literature DB >> 1541500

Value of radiograph audit in an accident service department.

H G Thomas1, A C Mason, R M Smith, C M Fergusson.   

Abstract

In our accident service department all trauma radiographs are reported acutely and those misinterpreted by the casualty officers are presented at the daily clinicoradiological conference. We have reviewed this practice over a 6-month period. From over 25,000 patients attending the accident service, 16,246 radiographs were requested and reported. Of these, 456 (2.8 per cent) were considered to have been potentially misinterpreted. The errors included 167 (1 per cent) missed fractures, 55 (0.3 per cent) suspected fractures and 72 (0.4 per cent) false-positive diagnoses of fracture. Subsequently, 114 (0.7 per cent) patients required recall for treatment or further imaging. Incorrect diagnoses were seen most frequently in the more commonly injured anatomical sites--the ankle, wrist, foot, elbow and hand. However, the incidence of misinterpretation was highest in examination of the fingers, especially in children. We believe that these low figures are principally the result of involving both orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists at the formal daily conference. We regard our system of audit as beneficial to patients' care and anticipate reduced litigation which may offset the increased cost of audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1541500     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90126-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

1.  Double take--fracture fishing in accident and emergency practice.

Authors:  P Hyland-McGuire; H R Guly; P M Hughes
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-03

2.  Comparing the accuracy of initial head CT reporting by radiologists, radiology trainees, neuroradiographers and emergency doctors.

Authors:  F A Gallagher; K Y Tay; S L Vowler; H Szutowicz; J J Cross; D J McAuley; N M Antoun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Trauma rapid review process: efficient out-patient fracture management.

Authors:  A Beiri; A Alani; T Ibrahim; G J S Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  After-hour trauma-radiograph interpretation in the emergency centre of a District Hospital.

Authors:  Yi-Ying Melissa Liu; Suzanne O'Hagan; Frederik Carl Holdt; Sa'ad Lahri; Richard Denys Pitcher
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Audit of litigation against the accident and emergency radiology department.

Authors:  S Cantoni; F De Stefano; A Mari; F Savaia; R Rosso; L Derchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Improved fracture detection using the mammographic film-screen combination.

Authors:  Y Faridah; Bjj Abdullah; Kh Ng
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2005-07-01

7.  Interpretation of Computed Tomography of the Head: Emergency Physicians versus Radiologists.

Authors:  Ali Arhami Dolatabadi; Alireza Baratloo; Alaleh Rouhipour; Ali Abdalvand; Hamidreza Hatamabadi; Mohammadmehdi Forouzanfar; Majid Shojaee; Behrooz Hashemi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2013-08-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.