Literature DB >> 1541100

Influence of political power, medical provincialism, and economic incentives on the rationing of surgical intensive care unit beds.

M F Marshall1, K J Schwenzer, M Orsina, J C Fletcher, C G Durbin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors influencing rationing decisions in a surgical ICU during a temporary nursing shortage when two to six of the unit's 16 beds were closed.
DESIGN: Blinded, concurrent data collection, retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Surgical ICU. PATIENTS: All patients (n = 308) for whom a surgical ICU bed was requested were studied during a 3-month period.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Admitting patterns did not change and no attempts were made to limit admissions to more severely ill patients during times of the greatest shortage of surgical ICU beds. Contrary to findings in previous reports, the severity of illness of patients admitted to the surgical ICU decreased as bed availability and bed census decreased. Bed allocation across surgical services was influenced by factors other than medical suitability. Of major users, cardiothoracic surgery experienced the highest percentage (59%) of all patient admissions and lowest percentage (1.6%) of all denied admissions. General surgery experienced the lowest percentage (15%) of all admissions and highest percentage (10.4%) of all denied admissions, although these patients had the highest average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores for all patients admitted (17.7) and for patients denied admission (15.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical attending physicians rarely used other open inhouse ICU beds when surgical ICU beds were unavailable. Political power, medical provincialism, and income maximization overrode medical suitability in the provision of critical care services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship; University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (Charlottesville, VA)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1541100     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199203000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  6 in total

1.  The process of intensive care triage.

Authors:  P D Levin; C L Sprung
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  How many intensive care beds are enough?

Authors:  Gordon D Rubenfeld; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Attending to the lightness of numbers: toward the understanding of critical care epidemiology.

Authors:  Valdelis N Okamoto; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit.

Authors:  João M Silva; Helder Marcus Costa Rocha; Henrique Tadashi Katayama; Leandro Ferreira Dias; Mateus Barros de Paula; Leusi Magda Romano Andraus; Jose Maria Correa Silva; Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Referral and admission to intensive care: A qualitative study of doctors' practices in a Tanzanian university hospital.

Authors:  Sofia Engdahl Mtango; Edwin Lugazia; Ulrika Baker; Yvonne Johansson; Tim Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Referral to immediate postoperative care in an intensive care unit from the perspective of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensive care physicians: a cross-sectional questionnaire.

Authors:  João Manoel Silva; Henrique Tadashi Katayama; Felipe Manuel Vasconcellos Lopes; Diogo Oliveira Toledo; Cristina Prata Amendola; Fernanda Dos Santos Oliveira; Leusi Magda Romano Andraus; Maria José C Carmona; Suzana Margareth Lobo; Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.