Literature DB >> 1540492

Drug related admissions to medical wards: a population based survey.

J Hallas1, L F Gram, E Grodum, N Damsbo, K Brøsen, T Haghfelt, B Harvald, J Beck-Nielsen, J Worm, K B Jensen.   

Abstract

1. In total 1999 consecutive admissions to six medical wards were subjected to a prospective high-intensity drug event monitoring scheme to assess the extent and pattern of admissions caused by adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or dose related therapeutic failures (TF), in a population-based design. The wards were sub-specialised in general medicine, geriatrics, endocrinology, cardiology, respiratory medicine and gastroenterology. 2. Considering definite, probable and possible drug events, the prevalence of drug related hospital admissions was 11.4% of which 8.4% were caused by ADRs and 3.0% by TFs. There were large inter-department differences. 3. The six classes of drugs most frequently involved in admissions caused by ADRs were anti-rheumatics and analgesics (27%), cardiovascular drugs (23%), psychotropic drugs (14%), anti-diabetics (12%), antibiotics (7%), and corticosteroids (5%). Noncompliance accounted for 66% of the TFs with diuretics and anti-asthmatics most frequently involved. 4. The pattern of drugs involved in ADRs was compared with the regional drug sales statistics. Drugs with a particularly high rate of ADR related admissions per unit dispensed were nitrofurantoin and insulin (617 and 182 admissions per 1,000,000 defined daily doses), while low rates were seen for diuretics and benzodiazepines (10 and 7 admissions per 1,000,000 defined daily doses). Confidence intervals were wide. 5. Patients who had their therapy prescribed by a hospital doctor had a slightly higher prevalence of drug events than those who were treated by a general practitioner (12.6% vs 11.8%). The reverse applied for drug events assessed as avoidable (3.3% vs 4.6%). Although these differences were not statistically significant, it may suggest general practitioners as the appropriate target for interventive measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1540492      PMCID: PMC1381200          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  20 in total

1.  Use of computerized databases to survey drug utilization in relation to diagnoses.

Authors:  B L Strom; M L Morse
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1988

2.  Hospital admissions for adverse reactions to drugs and deliberate self-poisoning.

Authors:  D I Cooke; W van der Merwe; D J Pudifin
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1985-05-11

3.  Prescription-event monitoring.

Authors:  W H Inman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-09-18

4.  Drug-related problems causing admission to a medical clinic.

Authors:  U Bergman; B E Wiholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The measurement of drug consumption. Drugs for diabetes in Northern Ireland, Norway and Sweden.

Authors:  U Bergman; P Elmes; M Halse; T Halvorsen; H Hood; P K Lunde; F Sjöqvist; O L Wade; B Westerholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-02-28       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Drug-related admissions to a department of medical gastroenterology. The role of self-medicated and prescribed drugs.

Authors:  J Hallas; K B Jensen; E Grodum; N Damsbo; L F Gram
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Drug-induced febrile mucocutaneous syndrome with a survey of the literature.

Authors:  L E Böttiger; I Strandberg; B Westerholm
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1975-09

8.  Admissions to hospital due to drugs.

Authors:  N Hurwitz
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-03-01

9.  Drug-induced parenchymal renal disease in outpatients.

Authors:  K Beard; D R Perera; H Jick
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Hospital bed occupancy due to drug-related problems.

Authors:  K Ghose
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Methods and systems to detect adverse drug reactions in hospitals.

Authors:  P A Thürmann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Managing alleged performance problems--are we ready?

Authors:  Tim Wilson; David Haslam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Prevalence of potentially preventable unplanned hospitalizations caused by therapeutic failures and adverse drug withdrawal events among older veterans.

Authors:  Zachary A Marcum; Mary Jo V Pugh; Megan E Amuan; Sherrie L Aspinall; Steven M Handler; Christine M Ruby; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  [Cooperation between physician and pharmacist to determine and resolve errors in concomitant medication previously prescribed for trauma patients. Quality assurance study].

Authors:  C Rapke; G Hofmann; H-W Stedtfeld; G Scherbel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review.

Authors:  R L Howard; A J Avery; S Slavenburg; S Royal; G Pipe; P Lucassen; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A small economic inducement to stimulate increased reporting of adverse drug reactions--a way of dealing with an old problem?

Authors:  M Bäckström; T Mjörndal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Validation of a comprehensive classification tool for treatment-related problems.

Authors:  Salah M AbuRuz; Nailya R Bulatova; Almoatasem M Yousef
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-10-26

8.  Infovigilance: reporting errors in official drug information sources.

Authors:  Isabelle Fusier; Corinne Tollier; Marie-Caroline Husson
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06

9.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by nurses in Sweden.

Authors:  M Bäckström; Elisabet Ekman; T Mjörndal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Detection of adverse drug reactions in a neurological department: comparison between intensified surveillance and a computer-assisted approach.

Authors:  Petra A Thuermann; Roland Windecker; Joachim Steffen; Markus Schaefer; Ute Tenter; Erich Reese; Hermann Menger; Klaus Schmitt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.