Literature DB >> 1539823

Force applied during tracheal intubation.

M J Bishop1, R M Harrington, A F Tencer.   

Abstract

This study quantitated the force applied during tracheal intubation to determine (a) whether the force differed among novice and experienced intubators, and (b) whether the force required differed when intubating patients' tracheas versus intubating the trachea of a commonly used training mannequin. We studied 27 tracheal intubations performed by 17 experienced (greater than 100 prior intubations) and 10 novice (less than 10 prior intubations) intubators. Each intubation was performed with a No. 3 Macintosh blade instrumented with strain gauges to determine force applied in the sagittal plane. The mean force applied was 24.6 +/- 2.9 N (mean +/- SEM) and the maximum force applied by each intubator was 47.6 +/- 3.8 N. There was no difference between groups in the mean force applied (28.8 +/- 6.1 N for the novice group vs 22.3 +/- 2.7 N for the experienced group, P = 0.27) nor in the maximum force applied (55.1 +/- 6.5 N for the novice group vs 43.2 +/- 4.7 N for the experienced group, P = 0.08). The only difference was in the impulse (force x duration), which was more for the novice group largely because of the longer average duration of intubation (40 +/- 12 s vs 19 +/- 4 s, P = 0.06). Among experienced intubators, we found that applied force correlated with patient weight and Mallampati class. Intubation of the Laerdal Airway Management Trainer required mean forces comparable to those required in patients (26.6 +/- 2.5 N vs 22.3 +/- 2.9 N), although the maximum force applied during the intubation effort was greater (58.3 +/- 4.7 N vs 43.2 +/- 4.7 N, P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1539823     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199203000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Transverse forces exerted on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy.

Authors:  M J Bucx; M H van der Vegt; C J Snijders; T Stijnen; P R Wesselink
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  M J Bucx; R T van Geel; J T Wegener; C Robers; T Stijnen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Tracheal intubation and laryngoscope design.

Authors:  J W McIntyre
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Manikin Laryngoscopy Motion as a Predictor of Patient Intubation Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Randolph H Hastings; Suraj Kedarisetty; Jennifer Moitoza Johnson; Dale Glaser; Nathan Delson
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2018-01-01

5.  Development of an Endotracheal Intubation Formative Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Adam Ryason; Emil R Petrusa; Uwe Kruger; Zhaohui Xia; Vanessa T Wong; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Stephanie B Jones
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2020-01-01

6.  A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Yasuaki Koyama; Takashiro Kondo; Yusuke Tsugawa; Kohei Hasegawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Technical realization of a sensorized neonatal intubation skill trainer for operators' retraining and a pilot study for its validation.

Authors:  Davide Panizza; Rosa T Scaramuzzo; Francesca Moscuzza; Ilaria Vannozzi; Massimiliano Ciantelli; Marzia Gentile; Ilaria Baldoli; Selene Tognarelli; Antonio Boldrini; Armando Cuttano
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Influence of videolaryngoscopy using McGrath Mac on the need for a helper to perform intubation during general anaesthesia: a multicentre randomised video-no-video trial.

Authors:  Olivier Belze; Zoé Coppere; Jonathan Ouattara; Laurie-Anne Thion; Xavier Paqueron; Jean-Michel Devys; Sabrina Ma; Titouan Kennel; Marc Fischler; Morgan Le Guen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation Comparing the Airtraq(®) with Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov; Mohhamed Al Jarallah; Andrea Cogliati; Maja Mojsova-Mijovska; Dragan Mijuskovic; Dimce Slaveski
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-10-05

10.  Challenges of prototyping, developing, and using video laryngoscopes produced by inhouse manufacturing on 3D printers.

Authors:  Victor Sampaio de Almeida; Vinicius Sampaio de Almeida; Guilherme Oliveira Campos
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.