Literature DB >> 1539785

2% propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit. A feasibility study.

M C Ewart1, K W Yau, M Morgan.   

Abstract

A 2% solution of propofol has been compared with the 1% formulation for sedation in patients whose lungs were being mechanically ventilated in an intensive care unit following coronary artery bypass surgery. There were no significant differences in the amount of propofol used in the two groups, the rate of propofol infusion or the number of changes made to the infusion rate to maintain the desired level of sedation. Recovery times and times to tracheal extubation were similar. The mean heart rates of those receiving 2% propofol were significantly higher throughout the period of the study for no apparent reason. Propofol 2% was found to be safe, easy to administer and a practical alternative to the 1% solution for sedating cardiac surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1539785     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pain relief following cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  A Taylor; D Phelan; J R McCarthy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Propofol for sedation in neuro-intensive care.

Authors:  Michael P Hutchens; Stavros Memtsoudis; Nicholas Sadovnikoff
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.