The effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary hyperemia in patients during coronary angiography.

The purpose of this study was to compare the differential effects of ionic, high-osmolar meglumine diatrizoate; ionic, low-osmolar ioxaglate meglumine; and nonionic, low-osmolar iohexol (all radiographic contrast agents) on coronary blood flow velocity and hyperemic responses during diagnostic coronary angiography. Coronary flow velocity and arterial pressure were measured at baseline and during maximal hyperemia after contrast media were randomly injected (4 to 6 ml into left coronary artery) in 22 patients with the use of a Judkins-style 20 MHz Doppler-tipped angiographic catheter. Contrast media-induced hyperemic responses were compared to those induced with intracoronary nitroglycerin (200 micrograms) and papaverine (10 mg). There were no significant differences in systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressure measurements among the three contrast agents. The increase in mean coronary flow velocity during hyperemia was 118 +/- 93%, 133 +/- 73%, and 136 +/- 86% for iohexol, ioxaglate meglumine, and diatrizoate, respectively (p = NS among agents vs 264 +/- 109% for papaverine; p less than 0.05 for all). Coronary vasodilatory reserve (calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to basal mean flow velocity) was also similar among agents. It was comparable to the coronary vasodilatory reserve with nitroglycerin (2.1 +/- 1.0 to 2.2 +/- 1.1) and significantly less than that with papaverine (3.3 +/- 2.2, p less than 0.05). These data indicate that the clinical advantages of nonionic or low-osmolar contrast media are not mechanistically related to significant attenuation of the coronary hyperemic response.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes