Literature DB >> 1539088

Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies.

W F Velicer1, J O Prochaska, J S Rossi, M G Snow.   

Abstract

Outcome measures for smoking cessation are reviewed and evaluated, including 3 self-report measures and 3 biochemical validation measures. Point prevalence reflects the percentage of participants taking action, prolonged abstinence reflects those in the maintenance stage, and continuous abstinence reflects those who progress from action to maintenance without lapsing or relapsing. Biochemical assessments are primarily measures of point prevalence abstinence. The desirability of biochemical validation is a particularly controversial and critical issue. Three factors affect the accuracy of self-report: Type of Population, Type of Intervention, and Demand Characteristics. False-negative rates are generally low. Three broad issues impact on decisions to use biochemical validation: (a) alternative explanations for false positives, (b) refusal rate problems, and (c) the effect of inaccuracy on intervention assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1539088     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  195 in total

1.  The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours.

Authors:  A J Farkas; E A Gilpin; J M Distefan; J P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Is telephone counselling a useful addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R D Reid; A Pipe; W A Dafoe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Characterizing and identifying "hard-core" smokers: implications for further reducing smoking prevalence.

Authors:  S Emery; E A Gilpin; C Ake; A J Farkas; J P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Short-term impact of a university based smoke free campaign.

Authors:  J F Etter; A Ronchi; T Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  The effect of a structured smoking cessation program, independent of exposure to existing interventions.

Authors:  C Manfredi; K S Crittenden; Y I Cho; J Engler; R Warnecke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The association of smoking and the cost of military training.

Authors:  R C Klesges; C K Haddock; C F Chang; G W Talcott; H A Lando
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The reach and effectiveness of a national mass media-led smoking cessation campaign in The Netherlands.

Authors:  A N Mudde; H De Vries
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Using radon risk to motivate smoking reduction: evaluation of written materials and brief telephone counselling.

Authors:  E Lichtenstein; J A Andrews; M E Lee; R E Glasgow; S E Hampson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of over-the-counter nicotine replacement.

Authors:  J R Hughes; S Shiffman; P Callas; J Zhang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Construct validity in health behavior research: interpreting latent variable models involving self-report and objective measures.

Authors:  Raymond F Palmer; John W Graham; Bonnie Taylor; James Tatterson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.