Literature DB >> 15390329

Volumetric and functional recovery of the liver after right hepatectomy for living donation.

Silvio Nadalin1, Giuliano Testa, Massimo Malagó, Mechtild Beste, Andrea Frilling, Thobias Schroeder, Christoph Jochum, Guido Gerken, Christoph E Broelsch.   

Abstract

Our objective was to study the kinetics of recovery of the liver volume and liver function after right hepatectomy (RH) for living donation, comparing conventional and quantitative liver function tests, i.e., galactose elimination capacity (GEC). A total of 27 donors underwent RH averaging 61% of the whole liver volume. The conventional and quantitative liver function tests, as well as magnetic resonance imaging volumetric studies, were performed preoperatively at postoperative day (POD) 10, 90, 180, and 360. Mean residual volume increased by 88% within 10 days from RH and thereafter did not show any significant variation. After 1 year, only 83% of the original volume was reached. GEC per milliliter of liver volume expressed in percent of initial value (GEC/mL) showed a decrease of 25% at POD10, an increase up to 125% at POD 180, and returned to normal values at POD 360. Liver biochemistries, International Normalized Ratio (INR), and bilirubin returned to normal in 10 days. Cholinesterase showed a similar course like GEC. In conclusion, within 10 days of 61% loss of its initial volume, the liver is capable of regenerating a volume necessary to its function, although it corresponds to only 74% of the initial one. It takes only 10 days to normalize liver biochemistries, while cholinesterase and albumin recover over 90 days. However, a direct measure of the cytosolic liver function obtained by GEC shows that functional recovery occurs much more gradually than the recovery of volume and liver biochemistries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15390329     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  40 in total

1.  Hepatocyte proliferation and hepatitis C virus kinetics during treatment.

Authors:  H Dahari; L Rong; T J Layden; S J Cotler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Function and volume recovery after partial hepatectomy: influence of preoperative liver function, residual liver volume, and obesity.

Authors:  Johan Friso Lock; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Steffi Hoppe; Rhea Isabel Röhl; Stefan Markus Niehues; Peter Neuhaus; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Systematic review of pathophysiological changes following hepatic resection.

Authors:  Joey Siu; John McCall; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Is the liver kinetic growth rate in ALPPS unprecedented when compared with PVE and living donor liver transplant? A multicentre analysis.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Maile Parker; Julie Heimbach; Charles Rosen; David M Nagorney
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Computer-assisted operative planning in adult living donor liver transplantation: a new way to resolve the dilemma of the middle hepatic vein.

Authors:  A Radtke; S Nadalin; G C Sotiropoulos; E P Molmenti; T Schroeder; C Valentin-Gamazo; H Lang; M Bockhorn; H O Peitgen; C E Broelsch; M Malagó
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 7.  [Living liver donor: indications and technical aspects].

Authors:  S Nadalin; I Capobianco; I Königsrainer; B Harder; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  A literature review of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): so far, so good.

Authors:  Martin de Santibañes; Luis Boccalatte; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-10-20

9.  Importance of conserving middle hepatic vein distal branches for homogeneous regeneration of the left liver after right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Faitot; Eric Vibert; Chady Salloum; David Lee Gorden; Franck Coscas; René Adam; Denis Castaing
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Limiting factors for liver regeneration after a major hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

Authors:  Christian Sturesson; Jan Nilsson; Sam Eriksson; Lidewij Spelt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.