Literature DB >> 15390166

Deforming the hippocampal map.

David S Touretzky1, Wendy E Weisman, Mark C Fuhs, William E Skaggs, Andre A Fenton, Robert U Muller.   

Abstract

To investigate conjoint stimulus control over place cells, Fenton et al. (J Gen Physiol 116:191-209, 2000a) recorded while rats foraged in a cylinder with 45 degrees black and white cue cards on the wall. Card centers were 135 degrees apart. In probe trials, the cards were rotated together or apart by 25 degrees . Firing field centers shifted during these trials, stretching and shrinking the cognitive map. Fenton et al. (2000b) described this deformation with an ad hoc vector field equation. We consider what sorts of neural network mechanisms might be capable of accounting for their observations. In an abstract, maximum likelihood formulation, the rat's location is estimated by a conjoint probability density function of landmark positions. In an attractor neural network model, recurrent connections produce a bump of activity over a two-dimensional array of cells; the bump's position is influenced by landmark features such as distances or bearings. If features are chosen with appropriate care, the attractor network and maximum likelihood models yield similar results, in accord with previous demonstrations that recurrent neural networks can efficiently implement maximum likelihood computations (Pouget et al. Neural Comput 10:373-401, 1998; Deneve et al. Nat Neurosci 4:826-831, 2001). Copyright (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15390166     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  13 in total

Review 1.  Independence of landmark and self-motion-guided navigation: a different role for grid cells.

Authors:  Bruno Poucet; Francesca Sargolini; Eun Y Song; Balázs Hangya; Steven Fox; Robert U Muller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Origin and role of path integration in the cognitive representations of the hippocampus: computational insights into open questions.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Attractor dynamics of spatially correlated neural activity in the limbic system.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory.

Authors:  Caswell Barry; Colin Lever; Robin Hayman; Tom Hartley; Stephen Burton; John O'Keefe; Kate Jeffery; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.353

5.  Sensory feedback, error correction, and remapping in a multiple oscillator model of place-cell activity.

Authors:  Joseph D Monaco; James J Knierim; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Reconceiving the hippocampal map as a topological template.

Authors:  Yuri Dabaghian; Vicky L Brandt; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Topological Schemas of Cognitive Maps and Spatial Learning.

Authors:  Andrey Babichev; Sen Cheng; Yuri A Dabaghian
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Gamma Synchronization Influences Map Formation Time in a Topological Model of Spatial Learning.

Authors:  Edward Basso; Mamiko Arai; Yuri Dabaghian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Transient cell assembly networks encode stable spatial memories.

Authors:  Andrey Babichev; Yuri Dabaghian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Topological Schemas of Memory Spaces.

Authors:  Andrey Babichev; Yuri A Dabaghian
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.