Literature DB >> 15389174

A randomized controlled clinical trial of stay-active care versus manual therapy in addition to stay-active care: functional variables and pain.

Marie I Grunnesjö1, Johan P Bogefeldt, Kurt F Svärdsudd, Stefan I E Blomberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of manual therapy in addition to the stay-active concept versus the stay-active concept only in low back pain patients. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial during 10 weeks.
METHODS: One hundred sixty outpatients with acute or subacute low back pain were recruited from a geographically defined area. They were randomly allocated to a reference group treated with the stay-active concept and, in some cases, muscle stretching and an experimental group receiving manual therapy and, in some cases, steroid injections in addition to the stay-active concept. Pain and disability rating index were used as outcome measures.
RESULTS: At baseline, the experimental group had somewhat more pain, a higher disability rating index, and more herniated disks than the reference group. After 5 and 10 weeks, the experimental group had less pain and a lower disability rating index than the reference group.
CONCLUSIONS: The manual treatment concept used in this study in low back pain patients appears to reduce pain and disability rating better than the traditional stay-active concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15389174     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  A literature review reveals that trials evaluating treatment of non-specific low back pain use inconsistent criteria to identify serious pathologies and nerve root involvement.

Authors:  Ciaran Williams; Mark J Hancock; Manuela Ferreira; Paulo Ferreira; Chris G Maher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The course of pain drawings during a 10-week treatment period in patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain.

Authors:  Marie Grunnesjö; Johan Bogefeldt; Stefan Blomberg; Heléne Delaney; Kurt Svärdsudd
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Subacute and chronic, non-specific back and neck pain: cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation versus primary care. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Odd Lindell; Sven-Erik Johansson; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  A comparison of manual therapy and active rehabilitation in the treatment of non specific low back pain with particular reference to a patient's Linton & Hallden psychological screening score: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elaine Hough; Richard Stephenson; Louise Swift
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The effect of the stay active advice on physical activity and on the course of acute severe low back pain.

Authors:  Patricia Olaya-Contreras; Jorma Styf; Daniel Arvidsson; Karin Frennered; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.