Literature DB >> 15387806

Effect of work duration on physiological and rating scale of perceived exertion responses during self-paced interval training.

Stephen Seiler1, Jarl Espen Sjursen.   

Abstract

This study compared running velocity, physiological responses, and perceived exertion during self-paced interval training bouts differing only in work bout duration. Twelve well-trained runners (nine males, three females, 28+/-5 years, VO2 max 65+/-6 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) performed preliminary testing followed by four "high-intensity" interval sessions (Latin squares, 1 session week(-1) over 4 weeks) consisting of 24 x 1, 12 x 2, 6 x 4, or 4 x 6-min running bouts with a 1:1 work-to-rest interval (total session duration 48 min). The average running velocity decreased (93%, 88%, 86%, 84% vVO2 max, P < 0.01) with increasing work duration. Peak VO2 averaged about 92+/-4% of VO2 max for 2-, 4-, and 6-min intervals compared with only 82+/-5% for 1-min bouts (P < 0.001). Six of 12 athletes achieved their highest average VO2 and heart rate during 4-min intervals. The average RPEpeak (rating scale of perceived exertion) was approximately 17+/-1 for all four interval sessions. RPE increased by 2-4 U during an interval training session. The mean lactate concentration was similar across sessions (4.3+/-1.1-4.6+/-1.5 mmol L(-1)). Under self-paced conditions, well-trained runners perform "high-intensity" intervals at an RPE of approximately 17, independent of interval duration. The optimal interval duration for eliciting a high physiological load is 3-5 min under these training conditions. Increases in RPE during an interval bout are not associated with increasing blood lactate concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15387806     DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.00353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  17 in total

Review 1.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Individual versus Standardized Running Protocols in the Determination of VO2max.

Authors:  Paula F Sperlich; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Jennifer L Reed; Christoph Zinner; Joachim Mester; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Comparing fat oxidation in an exercise test with moderate-intensity interval training.

Authors:  Shaea Alkahtani
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  [Oxidative stress in Masters swimmers following high-intensity (interval) training (HI(I)T)].

Authors:  Janina Braun; Magd Masoud; Klara Brixius; Christian Brinkmann
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-05-03

6.  High-intensity interval training with vibration as rest intervals attenuates fiber atrophy and prevents decreases in anaerobic performance.

Authors:  Sandro Manuel Mueller; David Aguayo; Matthias Zuercher; Oliver Fleischmann; Urs Boutellier; Maria Auer; Hans H Jung; Marco Toigo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Recovery Duration on Vastus Lateralis Oxygenation, Heart Rate, Perceived Exertion and Time Motion Descriptors during Small Sided Football Games.

Authors:  Scott McLean; Hugo Kerhervé; Geoff P Lovell; Adam D Gorman; Colin Solomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rethinking the role of fat oxidation: substrate utilisation during high-intensity interval training in well-trained and recreationally trained runners.

Authors:  Ken J Hetlelid; Daniel J Plews; Eva Herold; Paul B Laursen; Stephen Seiler
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2015-08-21

9.  Comparing continuous and intermittent exercise: an "isoeffort" and "isotime" approach.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolò; Ilenia Bazzucchi; Jonida Haxhi; Francesco Felici; Massimo Sacchetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction.

Authors:  Muhammad J Ali; Govindasamy Balasekaran; Hoon Kay Hiang; Gerald Seet Gim Lee
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.