Literature DB >> 15387491

Screening of pregnant Saudi women for hepatitis B surface antigen.

Yagob Y Al-Mazrou1, Mohamed Al-Jeffri, Mohamed K M Khalil, Yasser S Al-Ghamdi, Ameen Mishkhas, Mohamed Bakhsh, Mostafa Eisa, Mohamed Nageeb, Salah Tumsah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in pregnant women is considered the most important factor contributing to the higher carrier rate of HBsAg in some populations, including Saudi Arabia. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in infancy was implemented in Saudi Arabia in 1990 to avoid early acquisition of infection. At the same time, another program was launched to vaccinate all school children at school entry as a second target group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HBsAg prevalence rate in Saudi pregnant women 12 years after launching the program and to assess regional variation, if any.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 2664 pregnant Saudi women were recruited from the five main regions in Saudi Arabia. Blood samples were tested for HBsAg. Positive samples were tested also for HBeAg.
RESULTS: Of 2664 pregnant Saudi women, 65 were positive for HBsAg (2.46%, 95% CI=2.11%-2.69%). Four were positive for HBeAg (0.15%). The HBsAg prevalence rate was higher in Gizan (4.2%) and lower in Tabuk (1.4%) (P=-0.035). Only one case was positive for HBsAg in women under the age of 20 years (1/186), a 0.5% positivity rate in this age group compared with 2.6% in the older age group (P=-0.049 for the one-sided test). A history of surgical procedures was associated with a higher (3%), but not significantly higher rate of HBsAg positivity. No significant association was found between HBsAg positivity and a history of dental procedures or blood transfusion.
CONCLUSION: Although the HBsAg prevalence rate among Saudi pregnant women was lower than previously published data, the full impact of the hepatitis B vaccination program in infancy and childhood will take more years to decrease the prevalence rate in pregnant women. The MOH should continue to give the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine at birth to prevent early acquisition, but in the meantime a regional policy can be adopted to deal with the high prevalence rate of HBsAg among pregnant Saudi women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15387491      PMCID: PMC6148127          DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2004.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.526


Hepatitis B is of major public health importance. It is estimated that there are 350 million chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in the world, and that over one million deaths per year are due to progression of the chronic disease to cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma.1 Chronic HBV infection with persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) occurs in as many as 90% of infants infected by perinatal transmission, in 30% of children 1 to 5 years old infected after birth, and in 5% to 10% of older children, adolescents, and adults with HBV infection. Chronically infected persons are at high risk for developing chronic liver disease (cirrhosis, chronic active hepatitis, or chronic persistent hepatitis) or primary hepatocellular carcinoma later in life.2 The high prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in pregnant women is considered the most important factor contributing to the high carrier rate of HBsAg. Several factors, including the age at which infection occurs, predispose to the acquisition and frequency of the carrier state.3 Vaccination of the newborn of infected mothers can interrupt 85% to 90% of such mother-infant transmission. However, the transmission of HBV through placenta within the uterus cannot be interrupted by hepatitis B vaccination. Intrauterine transmission is an important mode of spreading HBV infection. Reported proportions of intrauterine transmission vary from 4.4% to 23.5%, but are mostly in the range of 5% to 15%.4,5 Before the vaccination era In Saudi Arabia, the HBsAg carrier rate was 16.7% in adults6 and 6.7% in children in a baseline survey before the introduction of mass immunization.7 The rate was higher in some regions, 11.1% for children in Gizan in the southwest,8 and as high as 19.9% in adult Saudi males.9 Materno-foetal transmission of hepatitis B virus in utero or during the perinatal period does not seem to be important in maintaining the carrier state in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of HBeAg in asymptomatic Saudi mothers is low compared to asymptomatic carrier mothers from the Orient. This may explain the minor role of vertical transmission in Saudi Arabia.10,11 A high incidence of primary hepatocellular carcinoma has been reported,12 especially in Gizan, where the prevalence of the HBsAg carrier state is high.13 Universal hepatitis B vaccination in infancy was implemented in Saudi Arabia in 1990 to avoid early acquisition of infection. At the same time, another program was launched to vaccinate all school children at school entry as a second target group. It was expected that by the year 2002, 12 years after the beginning of the program, this vaccination strategy would have led to the protection of all Saudis aged 0–18 years, who are at higher risk for acquiring hepatitis B virus and for developing the chronic carrier state. Based on the fact that the group less than 15 years of age represents 46.2% of population,14 and the 15–19 year old group represents 10.9% of population, more than 55% of the population was covered by vaccination in the year 2002. After the mass vaccination era, the overall HBsAg carrier rate in children dropped from 6.7% in 1989 to 0.3% in 1997,15 indicating that the program had a tremendous impact. The full impact of the vaccine on pregnant Saudi women will not be realized until the vaccinated cohorts reach the age of marriage. Evaluation of the carrier state in this important group should be done not only as an indicator to increase the hepatitis B vaccine dose given at birth, but also to monitor any regional variation and to develop regional policies if needed.

Methods

Our study was part of a national study to evaluate the serological status of different age groups of the population with respect to the pattern of diseases targeted by the Extended Program of Immunization in Saudi Arabia. The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity among pregnant Saudi women attending primary health care centers. In a cross-sectional study, samples of 2910 pregnant Saudi women were recruited from the five main regions of Saudi Arabia (northern, southern, eastern, western and central regions). Blood samples were collected and sent for assay in the central lab in Riyadh to be tested for HBsAg. Positive samples were tested also for HBeAg. Multistage sampling was used to draw the samples. In the first stage, the Kingdom was divided into five main regions (northern, southern, eastern, western and central). Within each region, one health province was selected randomly. The following provinces were selected: Tabuk (northern), Gizan (southern), Al-Qatif (eastern), Medina (western) and Al-Qassim (central). In the second stage, 12 primary health care centers were selected from each province, 8 centers from urban areas, and 4 from rural areas. The number of pregnant Saudi women included in each province depended on the population size of the province in relation to the total population of the Kingdom. Sample size was determined to calculate a national prevalence figure for the HBsAg positivity rate and to detect with 80% power and 95% confidence interval the difference between regions in the prevalence rate. Table 1 shows the sample distribution in each region.
Table 1

Number of pregnant Saudi women in the study by region.

RegionPlannedEnrolled*DroppedLaboratory**
Qatif4004000398
Madina840599241596
Qassim8408400840
Gizan5505500550
Tabuk2802800280
Gizan5505500550
Total291026692412664

Enrolled=planned minus dropped

Laboratory: samples processed in the lab; the difference between number processed and number enrolled was due to inadequate samples or other technical reasons.

Five milliliters of blood was collected in plain tubes from each woman. All serum samples were stored (in duplicates) at −20°C and transported frozen in cold boxes by DHL to the virology department in the central laboratory and blood bank, Riyadh. The request form signed by the doctor in charge was included with the samples. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for HBsAg and HBeAg screening and an HBsAg confirmatory test (neutralization) were applied using the following Abbott diagnostic products (Murex): Data entry and analysis was done using SPSS PC v. 10. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means while the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data.

Results

The mean age of the sample population was 28.44±6.76 years with regional values ranging from 29.42 years in Qassim to 27.39 years in Qatif (P=0.0001) (Table 2). There were significant regional differences in the number of pregnancies and the proportion of pregnant Saudi women under the age of 20 years. The proportion of pregnant women under the age of 20 years for all regions was 7.1%. The oldest girl vaccinated in 1990 during her first year of primary school is now 18 to 19 years of age. The mean age at first pregnancy was 22.7±4.1 years with a significant regional variation from 23.5 years in Qassim to 21.2 years in Tabuk (P=0.0001). This may reflect a higher age at marriage in Qassim.
Table 2

Mean age of pregnant Saudi women, number of pregnancies and proportion of pregnancies in women under the age of 20 years.

QatifMedinaQassimGizanTabukTotal*P value
Age (years)
 Mean27.3928.7129.4227.7927.7228.440.0001
 N3965818365442792636
 SD6.026.956.677.146.486.76

No. of pregnancies
 Mean3.564.483.974.844.824.290.0001
 N3805288245312792542
 SD2.753.193.13.793.313.28

Percent <20 years5.8% (23)5.7% (33)5.6% (47)10.8% (59)8.6% (24)7.1% (186)0.001
 N3965818365442792636

Missing data for 28 women (2664 minus 2636)

Of the 2664 samples screened, 84 were initially positive. After HBsAg confirmation, 65 were positive (Table 3). Accordingly, 2.4% of the total sample was HBsAg positive (95% confidence interval, 2.11%–2.69%), There was a regional variation as high as 4.2% in Gizan and as low as 1.4 in Tabuk (P=0.035). Only 4 among the 65 HBsAg carriers were positive for HBeAg, making a proportion of 0.15% (4/2664) of the total sample or 6.15% of the HBsAg carriers.
Table 3

Hepatitis B surface antigen and e positivity rate by region.

QatifMedinaQassimGizanTabukTotalP value
HBsAg positivity
 % (n)2.5% (10)2.3% (14)1.7% (14)4.2% (23)1.4% (4)2.4%* (65)0.035
 N3985968405502802664

HBeAg
 %0.5% (2) 3980.2% (1)00.2% (1)00.15% (4)0.28
 N5968405502802664

Positivity <20 years of age0% (0/23)0% (0/33)2.1% (1/47)0% (0/59)0% (0/24)0.5% (1/186)0.65

95% confidence interval, 2.11% to 2.69%

Only one case was positive for HBsAg among women under the age of 20 years (1/186), a 0.5% positivity rate in this age group compared with 2.6% in the older age group (P=0.085 for the two-sided and P=0.049 for the one-sided test). The age of this woman was 19 years while the age of the first cohort vaccinated at school entry in 1990 was about 18 years. Surgical procedures were associated with a higher (3%, 15/449), but not significantly higher rate of HBsAg positivity. No significant association was found between HBsAg positivity and dental procedures or blood transfusion (Table 4).
Table 4

Hepatitis B surface and e antigen by age group, history of surgery, dental procedures or blood transfusion.

VariableHBsAg positivity rateTotalP value
YesNo
< 20 years of age0.5% (1/186)2.6% (64/2450)2.46% (65/2636)0.085 two sided0.049 one sided

History of surgery3% (15/499)2.3% (50/2163)2.4% (65/2662)0.224

Blood transfusion1.7% (3/174)2.5% (62/2490)2.4% (65/2662)0.7

Dental procedures2.27% (32/1408)2.62% (33/1256)2.4% (65/2662)0.64

Discussion

The year 2002 marks the twelve anniversary of the implementation of the mass hepatitis B vaccination in Saudi Arabia. Since 1990, substantial progress has been made towards eliminating HBV transmission in children. Accordingly, a substantial decline in the incidence of HBV infection has occurred among groups with high coverage by the vaccine, such as young children, but the relative burden of HBV-related diseases acquired from infections in childhood still exist. Adult carriers still represent a risk of infection to their unvaccinated contacts. In early 80’s, the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen in pregnant Saudi mothers ranged from 3.9%11 to 16%,10 which is higher than the prevalence in this study. This decline in prevalence cannot be explained by the introduction of mass immunization, which most of the sample population were not exposed to, but by the adoption of universal procedures to decrease exposure to the virus. This was evident in this study where no increased association was found between the carrier rate and known risk factors like dental procedures, surgical operations and blood transfusions (Table 4). Our results show that the full impact of the hepatitis B vaccination program has not yet reached women during the maternity period. This was evident by comparing mothers less than 20 years with the rest of the group. The positivity rate in the less than 20 years age group was 0.5% compared with 2.6% in the older age group (P=0.085 for the two-sided and P=0.049 for the one-sided test). One of 186 women was positive, a 19-year-old, while the age of the first cohort vaccinated at school entry in 1990 was about 18 years during the study. Regional variation was prominent. Gizan showed the highest prevalence rate of 4.2% (Table 3). Regional variation may present a challenge to policy makers. Screening of pregnant mothers for the purpose of giving immunoglobulin at birth and giving the vaccine to infants of positive mothers proved to be not cost effective,16 even in a community with a high prevalence like Saudi Arabia where vertical transmission plays a minor role.10,11 Infection with HBV in adulthood is associated with a lower risk of chronic complications (5–10%).2 Hence, targeting older age groups with hepatitis B vaccine should take into consideration a cost-benefit assessment. Vaccination of Saudi mothers in the maternity period can be done at least on a regional basis as in Gizan where the infection rate is higher than other regions. The national strategy to eliminate HBV infection in Saudi Arabia is based mainly on vaccinating all infants as part of a childhood vaccination schedule. Screening of all pregnant women is not part of this strategy as vertical transmission is not an important route of infection, as reported in local studies. To accelerate elimination, additional interventions are needed. In a few more years, the vaccinated cohort will reach the age of marriage in Saudi Arabia. By that time the prevalence of HBsAg in pregnant Saudi mothers will reach a minimal level sufficient to shift the first dose hepatitis B vaccine to a higher age instead of giving it at birth. At that time combined vaccines containing hepatitis B can be given with DPT and Haemophilus influenza type b. Regional policies should be considered to deal with the situation in Gizan, where the prevalence rate is still significantly higher than other regions. Pregnant Saudi mothers should be screened and the appropriate preventive measures adopted. Vaccination of negative mothers should be considered, taking into consideration the added value to the hepatitis B control program as a whole.
Diagnostic productList No.Lot No.Exp Date
HBsAg screening version 39F 80-01H 4130102002 – 07
HBsAg confirmation version 38E 21-01H 3909102002 – 09
HBeAg/Anti-HBe9E 20-01H 4468102002 – 09
  12 in total

1.  Hepatitis B virus in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  M A el-Hazmi
Journal:  J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1989-02

2.  A profile of primary hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Gizan Area of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S J Ashraf; S C Arya; M el-Sayed; R Sahay; C M Parande; M R Tajuddin; M S Tobeiqi; A R Ageel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in Saudi children 8 years after a mass hepatitis B vaccination programme.

Authors:  F Z Al-Faleh; M Al-Jeffri; S Ramia; R Al-Rashed; M Arif; M Rezeig; I Al-Toraif; M Bakhsh; A Mishkkhas; O Makki; H Al-Freihi; S Mirdad; A AlJuma; T Yasin; A Al-Swailem; A Ayoola
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 4.  Hepatitis B: an important public health issue.

Authors:  W C Maddrey
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Hepatitis B virus vaccination and antenatal transmission of HBV markers to neonates.

Authors:  R Vranckx; A Alisjahbana; A Meheus
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.728

6.  Hepatitis B virus among Saudi children in Gizan, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  C M Parande; S C Arya; S J Ashraf
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Hepatitis B virus in Gizan, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S C Arya; S J Ashraf; C M Parande; M el-Sayed; R Sahay; A R Ageel; M S Tobeiqi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  Primary hepatocelluar carcinoma in Saudi Arabia. A clinicopathological study of 54 cases.

Authors:  M Atiyeh; M A Ali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Materno-foetal transmission of hepatitis B in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A H Basalamah; F Serebour; E Kazim
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 6.072

10.  Vertical transmission of hepatitis B surface antigen in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S Ramia; F Abdul-Jabbar; T M Bakir; A Hossain
Journal:  Ann Trop Paediatr       Date:  1984-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: Decreasing indication and changing trends.

Authors:  Waleed Al-Hamoudi; Hussien Elsiesy; Abdulrahman Bendahmash; Nasser Al-Masri; Safiyya Ali; Naglaa Allam; Mohammed Al Sofayan; Hamad Al Bahili; Mohammed Al Sebayel; Dieter Broering; Sammy Saab; Faisal Abaalkhail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hepatitis B virus sero-prevalence among pregnant females in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alrowaily; Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Mazen S Ferwanah
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

3.  Hepatitis B surface antigen prevalence in pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey in Iran.

Authors:  Alireza Shoghli; Seyed Mahmood Nabavi; Seyed Moayed Alavian; Goodarz Kolifarhood; Mohammad Mehdi Goya; Roshanak Namazi; Mojtaba Fallahnezhad; Mansor Mohajeri; Nouraldin Mousavinasab; Rahim Sorouri Zanjani; Mohammad Reza Saeini; Ahmad Jalilvand
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12

Review 4.  Epidemiology of viral hepatitis in Saudi Arabia: are we off the hook?

Authors:  Ayman A Abdo; Faisal M Sanai; Faleh Z Al-Faleh
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  SASLT practice guidelines for the management of hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Faisal Abaalkhail; Hussien Elsiesy; Ahmed AlOmair; Mohammed Y Alghamdi; Abduljaleel Alalwan; Nasser AlMasri; Waleed Al-Hamoudi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.