| Literature DB >> 15387345 |
Meri Koulentaki1, Joanna Moscandrea, Philipos Dimoulios, Costas Chatzicostas, Elias A Kouroumalis.
Abstract
The survival of 85 anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive (mean Mayo risk score, 5.11) and 19 AMA-negative (mean Mayo risk score, 4.77) primary biliary cirrhosis patients, under ursodeoxycholic acid not subjected to liver transplantation, was compared with the estimated survival of a simulated control group of untreated patients created with the updated Mayo model and a control group from the general population. In the first 7 years 3 AMA-negative patients died, versus 12 under the Mayo model (P = 0.01), and 10 AMA-positive patients, versus 26 under the Mayo model (P < 0.005), with 7 expected deaths from the general population (P < 0.0001). At 10 years the cumulative survival differed in the treated patients overall (P < 0.0001) but not in the early primary biliary cirrhosis (stages I-II) patients compared to the general population. Therefore the survival of our patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid is higher than that predicted from the Mayo model. Early treatment may prolong survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15387345 DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000037811.48575.da
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Dis Sci ISSN: 0163-2116 Impact factor: 3.199