Literature DB >> 15387085

Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.

Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska1, Adam Dudarewicz, Marek Bak, Marta Fiszer, Piotr Kotyło, Mariola Sliwińska-Kowalska.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused by noise. The aim of this study was to: (i) evaluate exposure to impulse noise from small-caliber weapons, (ii) compare the post-exposure changes in hearing measured by PTA and TEOAE and correlate them with noise parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 18 male hunters (group I) and 28 candidate policemen (group II) exposed to impulse noise from small firearms during target practices. Group I was unprotected during shooting, whereas group II used commonly available hearing protectors. PTA and TEOAE were performed before and 2-10 min after shooting. Exposure to impulse noise was evaluated by in situ measurements.
RESULTS: Groups I and II were exposed to 3-4 and 4-144 impulses of noise at mean C-weighted peak sound pressure levels of 154 dB and 156 dB, respectively. No post-exposure audiometric threshold shift was observed in group I. Significant reductions of TEOAE levels were found both for the whole response (-2.2 dB SPL) and for 1/2 -octave band responses in the frequency range of 1000-4000 Hz (from -1.6 to -3.0 dB SPL). These changes were not correlated with C-weighted peak sound pressure levels or equivalent-continuous A-weighted sound pressure level. Significant correlation was found for peak sound pressure and maximum sound pressure levels in 1/3-octave bands in the frequency range corresponding with the main part of the acoustic energy of impulses (correlation coefficients r from -0.58 to -0.77, p < 0.05). In group II neither PTA nor TEOAE showed significant hearing impairment after shooting.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that even short-term exposure to impulse noise from small-calibre firearms might cause temporary hearing impairment measured by TEOAE. Therefore, the use of earmuffs is strongly recommended, because most of them seem to effectively attenuate impulse noise from small-calibre firearms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15387085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health        ISSN: 1232-1087            Impact factor:   1.843


  5 in total

1.  Temporary threshold shift after impulse-noise during video game play: laboratory data.

Authors:  C Spankovich; S K Griffiths; E Lobariñas; K E Morgenstein; S de la Calle; V Ledon; D Guercio; C G Le Prell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Epidemiology of firearm and other noise exposures in the United States.

Authors:  Jay M Bhatt; Harrison W Lin; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Shooting history and presence of high-frequency hearing impairment in swedish hunters: A cross-sectional internet-based observational study.

Authors:  Louise Honeth; Peter Ström; Alexander Ploner; Dan Bagger-Sjöbäck; Ulf Rosenhall; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  The Impact of Different Permissible Exposure Limits on Hearing Threshold Levels Beyond 25 dBA.

Authors:  Balachandar S Sayapathi; Anselm Ting Su; David Koh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Assessment of impulse noise level and acoustic trauma in military personnel.

Authors:  Maryam Rezaee; Mohammad Mojtahed; Mohammad Ghasemi; Babak Saedi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2012-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.