Literature DB >> 1538630

Relation of physicians' predicted probabilities of pneumonia to their utilities for ordering chest x-rays to detect pneumonia.

P S Heckerling1, T G Tape, R S Wigton.   

Abstract

To investigate the relation between physicians' predicted probabilities of pneumonia and their utilities for ordering chest x-rays to detect pneumonia, the authors studied 52 physicians who ordered chest x-rays of 886 patients presenting to an emergency department with fever or respiratory complaints. Physicians estimated the probability of pneumonia prior to obtaining the results of the chest x-ray. Utilities were assessed by asking physicians to consider a hypothetical patient presenting with acute respiratory symptoms, with unknown chest x-ray status, and to rank on a scale from +50 ("best thing I could do") to -50 ("worst thing I could do") their rating scale utilities for not diagnosing pneumonia and not ordering a chest x-ray when the patient had pneumonia (i.e., missing a pneumonia), and for diagnosing pneumonia and ordering a chest x-ray when the patient did not have pneumonia (i.e., ordering an unnecessary x-ray). The utility for ordering an unnecessary x-ray was negatively correlated with average predicted probability (r = -0.1495, p = 0.29), whereas the utility for missing a pneumonia was positively correlated with average predicted probability (r = 0.2254, p = 0.11), although the correlations were not statistically significant. Relative chagrin, defined as the difference in these utilities, was significantly inversely correlated with average predicted probability (r = -0.2992, p less than 0.035), even after adjusting for the prevalence of pneumonia seen by each physician (partial r = -0.42, p less than 0.0027). It is concluded that physicians who experienced greater regret over missing a pneumonia than over ordering an unnecessary x-ray estimated lower probabilities of pneumonia for patients for whom they ordered x-rays.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538630     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  3 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in medicine and health care: questions and controversy.

Authors:  R M Poses; A M Isen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Mammographers' perception of women's breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Joseph R Egger; Gary R Cutter; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; R Edward Hendrick; Carl J D'Orsi; Jessica S Fosse; Linn Abraham; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Adult Outpatients With Acute Cough Due to Suspected Pneumonia or Influenza: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Adam T Hill; Philip M Gold; Ali A El Solh; Joshua P Metlay; Belinda Ireland; Richard S Irwin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 9.410

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.