Literature DB >> 1538612

Measuring impact of sickness in patients with nonspecific abdominal complaints in a Dutch family practice setting.

H M Jacobs1, A Luttik, F W Touw-Otten, M Kastein, R A de Melker.   

Abstract

The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was applied in a Dutch primary care population who had nonspecific abdominal complaints. The study was conducted to test applicability and feasibility of the SIP as an outcome measurement in primary care research on patients with minor illness. The study was performed in five family practice settings. Included in the study were all patients aged 18 to 75 years who visited their family doctor during a 7 week period with nonspecific abdominal complaints. Feasibility was tested by interviewing patients at their homes within a time limit of 24 hours after the consultation with their family doctor. To test applicability, dysfunction in patients with nonspecific abdominal complaints was compared with dysfunction in an open population and in a population with low back pain. Results revealed that highly prevalent dysfunctional behavior in patients with nonspecific abdominal complaints differed from highly prevalent dysfunction in a reference group of patients with low back pain and in an open population. The SIP data confirmed the characteristics of nonspecific abdominal complaints as multiconditional illness. The data obtained were recognizably related to the nature of nonspecific abdominal complaints, emphasizing the applicability of the SIP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538612     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199203000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  3 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; A Cull; K Bjordal; M Groenvold; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.